Huge, Illegal Geoengineering Experiment

By Evan Ackerman

2:09PM on Oct 16, 2012

NASA image of an algae bloom in the Barents Sea.

The Guardian is reporting evidence of a geoengineering experiment that took place off the coast of Canada. Apparently, some American businessman lied to an indigenous Canadian community to get permission to dump 100 tons of iron sulphate into the Pacific in a scheme to make money from carbon credits. WTF.

We’ve talked about ocean fertilization with iron sulphate on DVICE before: the idea is that, by dumping iron into the ocean, you can cause large blooms of algae. The aglae absorb carbon out of the atmosphere, die and sink, effectively trapping that carbon at the bottom of the ocean. Studies have shown that it does work as advertised, and that it may be one way of cheaply and effectively mitigating the buildup of carbon in our atmosphere. However, there are still lots of questions about it, especially when it comes to long-term effects like deep-water oxygen depletion and screwing up food chains. In any case, it’s not ready to be tried on an industrial scale without a lot more study.

The fact that ocean fertilization might irreparably harm local ecosystems has not stopped Russ George, an American businessman and (it seems) total jerkface, from convincing the local council of an indigenous village on the west coast of Canada to spend $1 million helping him dump 100 tons of iron sulphate into their waters in a move that he said would help enhance the salmon population. Really, George was just hoping to create an algae bloom that would then generate carbon credits that could be sold for a profit.

For the record, this is a hugely illegal thing to do, in violation of two United Nations moratoria. And George has tried (and failed) to do it before, near the Galapagos and Canary Islands, after which both the Ecuadorean and Spanish governments banned his ships from their ports. In addition to being illegal, it’s just a terrible idea for someone to go out and to do try and make money. I mean, if it proves (after much more research) that it’s a safe and viable way of reducing global atmospheric carbon, then great, it should be done in moderation in carefully monitored and controlled ways. It should not be done for profit, since that’s a surefire way to get to some serious environment disaster.

It’s already too late for the Canadian coast. George dumped his iron sulphate from a fishing boat about 200 miles off the coast back in July, and satellite images from August show an algae bloom as large as 10,000 square kilometers. George is supposedly out there with some unspecified scientists monitoring everything and insisting that it’s all great, but the UN, world governments, environmental groups, and the indigenous Canadians that he conned are all demanding legal action. We hope they get it.

Guardian, via io9

New Report: Widespread Seafood Fraud in LA

New Report: Widespread Seafood Fraud in LA.

Protecting the Worlds Oceans

April 29, 2012

Red snapper is often mislabeled.

Something’s fishy in Los Angeles.

That’s according to our new report, which found widespread seafood mislabeling in the LA-area. DNA testing confirms that 55 percent of the seafood our campaigners sampled was mislabeled based on federal law.

In May and December of 2011, Oceana staff and supporters collected 119 seafood samples from grocery stores, restaurants and sushi venues in Los Angeles and Orange counties. The targeted species included those that were found to be mislabeled in previous studies as well as those with regional significance such as wild salmon, Dover or other regional soles, red snapper, yellowtail and white tuna.

Among the report’s other key findings include:

  • Fraud was detected in 11 out of 18 different types of fish purchased.
  • Every single fish sold with the word “snapper” in the label (34 out of 34) was mislabeled, according to federal guidelines.
  • Nearly nine out of every ten sushi samples was mislabeled.
  • Eight out of nine sushi samples labeled as “white tuna” were actually escolar, a species that carries a health warning for it laxative effects.

Earlier this year, California State Senator Ted W. Lieu introduced legislation, sponsored by Oceana, that would require large restaurant chains to accurately label their seafood by species, country of origin and whether it is farmed or wild. The bill would be a great first step to ending seafood fraud.

Last October, Oceana also found mislabeling of nearly one in five fish fillets sampled in Boston-area supermarkets.

“It is disheartening to know that consumers are not getting what they pay for,” said Beth Lowell, campaign director at Oceana. “Seafood fraud is not only ripping off consumers, but it is putting their health at risk and undermining their efforts to eat sustainably.”

Check out the LA Times story about our report and take action by telling your Senators to stop seafood fraud.

Article Link:  http://oceana.org/en/blog/2012/04/new-report-widespread-seafood-fraud-in-la?akid=2396.847765.2539g5&rd=1&source=mailing&t=11

Protect Our Wildlife and Waterways from Dangerous Pesticides – The Petition Site

Protect Our Wildlife and Waterways from Dangerous Pesticides – The Petition Site.

Protect Our Wildlife and Waterways from Dangerous Pesticides

Protect Our Wildlife and Waterways from Dangerous Pesticides

Pesticide contamination is widespread in our waterways and water supply, and has been linked to birth defects, deformities, fertility problems and certain cancers. These toxic pesticides present a significant, unnecessary threat to wildlife and human health every day in the United States.

Yet right now, industry lobbyists are trying to persuade Congress to gut the Clean Water Act to allow unregulated pesticide applications in our water. At the same time, the Environmental Protection Agency is poised to approve the broad-scale application of pesticides into wetlands and waterways.

Demand that our wildlife and waterways get stronger protections. Tell Congress and the EPA to keep pesticides out of our water.     (PETITION LINK)

Experts: Much bigger sea level rise likely – US news – Environment – Climate Change – msnbc.com

Experts: Much bigger sea level rise likely – US news – Environment – Climate Change – msnbc.com.

 Sea levels could rise by 2-3 feet more, Arctic experts say  Report on melting ice, warmer sea temps issued for U.S., other Arctic Council nations

water, water everywhere!

STOCKHOLM— The Arctic is melting faster than expected
and could contribute 2-3 feet more in global sea levels by
2100 than earlier thought, experts state in a report being
presented to international officials on Wednesday. The
report shatters predictions made four years ago by the
authoritative U.N. climate change panel.

“The observed changes in sea ice on the Arctic Ocean, in the
mass of the Greenland ice sheet and Arctic ice caps and
glaciers over the past 10 years are dramatic and
represent an obvious departure from the long-term
patterns,” the international Arctic Monitoring and
Assessment Program says in its report.

The report compiles the latest science on how climate change has impacted the Arctic in the past six years.

Melting Arctic glaciers and ice caps are projected to help raise global sea levels by 35 to 63 inches by 2100, the program’s scientists stated.

While the program noted the estimate was highlyuncertain, the range was a sharp jump from a 2007 projection of 7 to 23 inches by the U.N.’s scientific panel Sea levels could rise by 2-3 feet more, Arctic experts say
Report on melting ice, warmer sea temps issued for U.S., other Arctic Council nations on climate change. Those numbers did not include a possible acceleration of a thaw in polar regions.

A leading ice specialist, Richard Alley of Pennsylvania State University, who did not take part in the assessment, agreed that recent scientific estimates generally support its central finding.

A sea level rise of more than 3 feet this century “fits well within these estimates, and a somewhat higher value cannot be excluded,” Alley said.

Such a rise — above most past scientific estimates — would add to threats to coasts from Bangladesh to Florida, low-lying Pacific islands and cities from
London to Shanghai. It would also, for instance, raise costs of building tsunami barriers in Japan.

A summary of the key findings shows Arctic temperatures during that period were the highest since measurements began in 1880.

“The past six years have been the warmest period ever recorded in the Arctic,” the report stated. The program is backed by the United States and seven other nations that make up the Arctic Council.

“In the future, global sea level is projected to rise by 0.9 meters (35 inches) to 1.6 meters (63 inches) by 2100 and the loss of ice from Arctic glaciers, ice caps and the Greenland ice sheet will make a substantial contribution,” it said. The rises were projected from1990 levels.

“Arctic glaciers, ice caps and the Greenland ice sheet contributed over 40 percent of the global sea level rise of around 3 mm per year observed between 2003 and2008,” it said.

The report was to be unveiled at a meeting of Arctic Council officials on Wednesday.  Foreign ministers from Arctic Council nations — the United States, Russia, Canada, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Norway and Iceland — are due to meet in Greenland on May 12.

“It is worrying that the most recent science points to much higher sea level rise than we have been expecting until now,” European Climate

Commissioner Connie Hedegaard told Reuters. U.N. talks on a global pact to combat climate change are making sluggish progress.  The United Nations says national promises to limit greenhouse gas emissions, mainly from burning fossil fuels, are insufficient to avoid dangerous changes.

The new report, drawing on work by hundreds of experts, said there were signs that warming was accelerating.

“The increase in annual average temperature since 1980 has been twice as high over the Arctic as it has been over the rest of the world,” the report said. Temperatures were higher than at any time in the past 2,000 years, it added.

As a result, the Arctic Ocean could be nearly ice free in summers within 30 to 40 years, earlier than projected by the U.N. climate panel, it stated.

As reflective ice and snow shrink, they expose ever bigger areas of darker water or soil. Those dark regions soak up ever more heat from the sun, in turn stoking a melt of the remaining ice and snow.

“There is evidence that two components of the Arctic cryosphere — snow and sea ice — are interacting with the climate system to accelerate warming,” the report stated said. (read more)
———————————————————————–
Reuters and The Associated Press contributed to this report.
——————————————————————=—

Cosmic Log – How radiation affects the fish

Cosmic Log – How radiation affects the fish.

How radiation affects the fish

Sukree Sukplang / Reuters

An official from Thailand’s Food and Drug Administration takes a sample from a shipment of frozen fish imported from Japan to test for possible radiation contamination at a customs station in Bangkok today.

Experts say that fish and other marine species shouldn’t be as affected by Japan’s nuclear crisis as species on land, in part because of differences in the ways radiation is dispersed.

But that doesn’t mean authorities can ease up on monitoring the sea and its bounty for contamination. To the contrary: Inspectors around the world are keeping a close eye on food imports from Japan, and some countries have ordered special inspections or even outright bans on fish coming from areas near the plant.


Twenty days after Japan’s earthquake and tsunami touched off a breakdown and partial meltdown at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear complex, some radiation experts are still struggling to get an accurate read on the situation.

“My basic feeling is that they’re going to come to grips with this, and at the end of the day, it’s not going to be as bad as people fear,” said Florida State University oceanographer William Burnett, an expert on the environmental effects of radioactivity. “Having said that, trying to follow this story has been difficult. I see almost no real data.”

The most reliable measurements have been coming from the International Atomic Energy’s daily updates on the situation, said Andrew Maidment, a professor of radiology and chief of the physics section at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. So get ready for some real data.   (Click Here For  Full Article/Data)