FYI: Volatile Organic Compound (VOC)

RX Inserts “Unreadable?”

Prescription drug insert sheets blasted as “unreadable” … they’re intentionally designed to obscure risks and side effects

Image: Prescription drug insert sheets blasted as “unreadable” … they’re intentionally designed to obscure risks and side effects






(Natural News) If you’ve ever taken a prescription drug, you are probably familiar with those paper inserts that come inside the package – although there’s a good chance you’ve never actually read every word on them. These papers are filled with tiny print outlining the medication’s purpose, dosage, and side effects, but they are so long and technical that few people actually read them from start to finish.

The U.K.’s Academy of Medical Sciences recently slammed the pamphlets in a report, saying that patients find them “unreadable” and “impenetrable” and that they need to be made clearer to increase patient understanding.

The Chair of the report, Professor Sir John Tooke, took pharmaceutical companies to task for the confusing scientific language used in the leaflets. For example, the inserts inside acetaminophen mention the chances of developing pancreatitis and hepatitis but don’t shed light into what those conditions are or just how high the risk is. He says the inserts “aren’t written from a consumer’s perspective.”

Of course, this complex language is really good at accomplishing one thing: making people give up in frustration and ensuring they do not grasp the full extent of the possible side effects that could occur from taking a particular medication. By obscuring the truth about a drug’s side effects and risks, more people will take them and refill their prescription without worrying too much about the repercussions, fattening the wallets of Big Pharma.

By the way, this problem extends to vaccines. In fact, many patients never even read the inserts that come with vaccines because their doctors open up the package and administer it on the spot. If they did read it, they would have known, for example, that the fine print on the package insert of the 2013-2014 flu shot contained mercury, thimerosal and formaldehyde, and that its safety had not been established in pregnant women even though it was administered to them. Even more outrageously, the vaccine comes with just one insert despite being a 10-dose vial intended for 10 different people.

Patients, doctors don’t trust pharmaceutical companies

The Academy of Medical Sciences report also showed that patients trust their friends and family’s opinion more than clinical trial results when it comes to the effectiveness and safety of the drugs they take. After surveying more than 2,000 members of the public and 1,000 doctors, they found that 65 percent of people trust the opinion of their friends and family, while just 37 percent trust medical research evidence.

In addition, they found that 63 percent of the public was skeptical of the claims made by drug trials. Even more concerning was the fact that 82 percent of doctors said they were skeptical of drug trial claims, with the same amount believing that medical research is biased toward making the drugs appear safe and effective. This begs the question of why they continue to prescribe medication if they have such a high degree of mistrust.

The Academy has also proposed a list of questions that patients should ask their doctors when being prescribed medication. It includes questions like how a medication can improve their health and if it can be taken with other medications, but it conveniently omits questions like whether natural or safer alternatives exist.

The FDA reports that medication errors lead to at least one death each day and injure around 1.3 million Americans each year, while the Pharma Death Clock says that nearly 400,000 people have been killed by prescription drugs since 2000. Clear and honest prescription inserts in easy-to-read language and type could go a long way toward helping to prevent many of these unnecessary deaths and injuries.

Sources include:




Word: Eat For Health



9 Countries That Do It Better: Why Does Europe Take Better Care of Its People Than America? | | AlterNet

9 Countries That Do It Better: Why Does Europe Take Better Care of Its People Than America? | | AlterNet.

9 Countries That Do It Better: Why D

                               Does Europe Take Better Care of ItsPeople Than America?

The world’s wealthy democracies have somewhat different priorities, leading to some very different outcomes for their citizens.
 An abiding belief in American exceptionalism is more or less ubiquitous across the political spectrum. But in many ways, what makes America different from other advanced democracies are relatively modest differences in priorities. While all wealthy democracies share the same basic model –they derive the bulk of their economic activity from the private sector while offering some form of social safety net for those who fall through the cracks — even slight differences in priorities can have a huge impact on the lives of their people.

Here are 9 countries that do a better job providing for their citizens than we do.   (LEARN MORE)

For CA Residents: Ella Baker Center for Human Rights:

Ella Baker Center for Human Rights:.

Support the Healthy Air Trust

Power Plant in a Playground

California needs your help!  Our state is leading the nation by charging polluters for their harm to the environment. Now the decision about where that money is spent is in our hands. The Communities Healthy Air Revitalization Trust (CHART) will send funds to the neighborhoods most impacted by poverty and contamination to help promote health and fight pollution.

This week, the State Senate Appropriations Committee will be voting on a bill to ensure at least 10% of those funds go back to the communities most harmed by dirty energy and unemployment– your voice is needed to guarantee our legislators vote with us.

Take action and urge the committee to vote “Yes” on this bill.  (Go To Petition Page)