Giant Sinkhole Now 9 Acres

Sinkhole to be seen in 3-D | HoumaToday.com
January 20, 2013

ENVIRONS_SINK-HOLE

An aerial view of the sinkhole in Assumption Parish taken earlier this week. Flooding from heavy rains mix the swamp with the 9-acre hole.

Published: Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 6:01 a.m.
Last Modified: Saturday, January 19, 2013 at 12:42 a.m.

Scientists are starting to map out a three-dimensional look of the ground below the Assumption Parish sinkhole as nearby residents approach the sixth month of being evacuated.

The sinkhole was discovered on Aug. 3, (2012) prompting an evacuation of about 150 homes in the nearby Bayou Corne community.

In the time since, state and local officials have been able to determine the cause of the now 9-acre hole but have not been confident enough with the situation to lift the evacuation order.

“There are many things that are still a mystery,” said John Boudreaux, Assumption Parish Office of Emergency Preparedness director.

The hole is about 660 feet wide and has grown largely because of sloughing off on the edges, Boudreaux said.

“The evacuation order is still necessary because there are three benchmarks we are still looking for answers to,” Boudreaux said.

Last year, scientists determined the hole was caused when a subterranean cavern owned by Texas Brine LLC collapsed.

The cavern sits thousands of feet below the surface in the Napoleonville Salt Dome. Salt domes are naturally occurring deposits of salt. Private companies commonly carve out deposits in these domes to store volatile gases or waste.

Texas Brine was using the failed cavern to extract brine, which is used in various industrial and oilfield applications.

Boudreaux said officials want to determine how much of the earth between the sinkhole and failed cavern has settled.

“There is the possibility that there are other void spaces in the ground,” Boudreaux said.

These void spaces could eventually lead to the sinkhole growing or another hole as the failed cavern fills completely in.

“We don’t know for sure yet, that is the issue,” Boudreaux said.

Following a brief conflict over what solution would work best, the state Department of Natural Resource and Texas Brine agreed that 3-D imaging of the subsurface would give researchers an exact picture of how the earth might shift in the future, said DNR spokesman Patrick Courreges.

Courreges said the goal is to have the imaging complete by April(2013).

Boudreaux said there also needs to be an effort to get the gasses trapped below the community down to safe levels.

Texas Brine and the Department of Natural Resources have underground wells venting off the gas.

Boudreaux said they’ve vented about 5 percent of the gas estimated to have accumulated near the surface. Nobody knows how much gas is below the area, he said.

Texas Brine is in the process of drilling more vent wells, Courreges said.

Texas Brine has been fined twice for not following a state directive to install gas monitors in local homes, Courreges said. The fines total $250,000 and were also assessed for failing to property contain oil and gas in the sinkhole.

The first of the in-home monitors were installed Thursday while the rest should go in within a few days, Boudreaux said.

Another concern is the stability of the rest of the salt dome. Boudreaux noted there are other caverns inside the dome and some house oil and gas.

“The concern is this cavern would have a domino effect on other caverns because this one is failing,” Boudreaux said. “It could cause a bigger problem.”

Boudreaux said there isn’t a time frame for lifting the evacuation order because there are still these unknowns.

“There is no book to tell us what will happen over time,” Boudreaux said.

Parish Police Jury President Martin Triche said the residents of about half of the 150 homes under evacuation have heeded the order.

“I’ve always said the pace is going too slow,” Triche said. “My impression is that if Texas Brine had been more aggressive early along, we could have had this settled by now.”

Aside from the residents’ safety there is also concerns about property values plummeting, Triche said. He said he asked Texas Brine to consider offering buyouts to those who don’t feel the area is fit to live in anymore.

“Many of the residents don’t want to move away,” Triche said. “We hope to restore things back to their normal environment.”

It’s unclear how long that might take, but in the meantime, Boudreaux said there are two public meetings scheduled in the coming weeks. The first will take place on Jan. 30 (2013) and feature scientists from Texas Brine. The next will be on Feb. 6 and feature state scientists and scientists from the Shaw Group.

Both meetings are scheduled for 6 p.m. at the Assumption Parish Community Center.

Link:  http://www.houmatoday.com/article/20130119/ARTICLES/130119602?p=all&tc=pgall

Update: Shell’s “Happy” Mood Smashed By Ice

earthjustice.org

Shell’s “Happy” Mood Smashed By Ice

September 17, 2012

14 September 2012, 4:17 PM – Mass of sea ice forces drilling to halt, raises doubts about spill cleanup

Chukchi Sea, Alaska. (Florian Schulz / visionsofthewild.com)

Shell’s vice president of Alaska operations was quoted last Saturday as saying “Happy, happy, happy.” Then the ice showed up.

Hours after Shell began drilling in the Artic, operations were forced to shut down to accommodate a drifting 30-mile by 12-mile hunk of sea ice, moving at a rate of a mile every 30 minutes. That’s what ice does in the Arctic—it is unpredictable, unforgiving and moves in with the high winds just in time to ruin a happy day.

A week ago, the Department of the Interior approved drilling in “non-oil-bearing zones” and Shell immediately began drilling its first exploration well in the Chukchi Sea, off the coast of Northern Alaska in the early morning hours of Sunday. The drilling lasted only a few hours before the company took a “precautionary” move and disconnected the drilling rig from the seafloor anchors and temporarily moved the vessel off the well site. One wonders what would happen if such an ice mass moved in while Shell was trying to respond to a major oil spill.

The window for Shell to strike oil this season is rapidly closing as Shell is approved only until Sept. 24 for drilling into the oil-bearing zones. The company has asked for an 18-day extension but Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said that extension decisions won’t happen until after the final permits to drill deeper have been issued.

Drilling deeper this year has not been possible so far because of challenges with the Arctic Challenger, the oil spill response and containment barge, which had been undergoing retrofitting and testing in Washington State for months. Until Shell gets Coast Guard and various agency approvals of this vessel and moves it in place in the Arctic, Shell can’t drill for oil.

The Arctic Challenger left Bellingham, Washington in the middle of the night last week and hasn’t been seen since. Sea testing? On its way to the Arctic while undergoing sea testing? We don’t really know, even though the administration and Shell both promised the communities of the Arctic and the rest of us—transparency.

The latest government approvals to Shell’s ever-changing set of standards, specifically the air pollution and sea-worthiness of vessels, have been made without any public process and in some cases the official documents have only been released to the public after repeated requests. The public has yet to see Shell’s official request to extend the drilling season. That’s about as transparent as the gooey waters of an oil spill.

Earthjustice continues to represent its clients in challenging flawed and unlawful oil-spill response plans, air pollution permits and leases. Our aim remains to protect the pristine American Arctic waters from harmful industrial activities in the short term with a long-term focus of conservation based on best available science.

The implications of a failed Arctic ecosystem will affect us all through the rapid effects of climate change. And there’s nothing “happy, happy, happy” about that.

Link:  http://earthjustice.org/blog/2012-september/shell-s-happy-mood-smashed-by-ice

enews@earthjustice.org

Chicco Polly High Chairs Recalled

Chicco Polly High Chairs Recalled Due to Laceration Hazard

http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml12/12221.html

July 12, 2012
CPSC Seal Health Canada Seal
U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission
http://www.cpsc.gov
Health Canada
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 11, 2012
Release #12-221
Firm’s Recall Hotline: (800) 807-8817
CPSC Recall Hotline: (800) 638-2772
CPSC Media Contact: (301) 504-7908
HC Media Contact: (613) 957-2983

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission and Health Canada, in cooperation with the firm named below, today announced a voluntary recall of the following consumer product. Consumers should stop using recalled products immediately unless otherwise instructed. It is illegal to resell or attempt to resell a recalled consumer product.

Name of Product: Chicco Polly High Chair

Units: About 455,000 in the United States and 30,690 in Canada

Importer: Artsana USA Inc., of Lancaster, Pa.

Hazard: Children can fall on or against the pegs on the rear legs of the high chair, resulting in a bruising or laceration injury.

Incidents/Injuries: The firm is aware of 21 reports of incidents in which a child fell against the peg and received injuries, including four laceration injuries requiring medical closure (stitches, tape or glue) and one scratched cornea.

Description: This recall involves a range of Chicco Polly high chairs with pegs on the back legs intended for tray storage. The high chairs have a folding metal frame for storage and a reclining seat. The recalled high chairs can be identified by the model number and date code printed on a label on the underside of the seat, close to the footrest. The date code is in the format DDMMYYYY or YYYY-MM-DD. High chairs included in this recall were manufactured prior to October 13, 2010 and have one of the following model numbers on the label:

Model Numbers
00063803430070 05063803260070
00063803480070 05063803270070
00063803490070 05063803570070
00063803580070 05063803660070
04063765000070 05063803970070
04063765540070 06063765650070
04063765760070 06063765970070
04063803630070 06063803650070
04063803860070 06063803770070
04063803900070 06063803820070
05063765020070 06063803960070
05063803020070 06063803970070
05063803220070 07063803780070

Sold at: Retail stores including Babies R Us, Burlington Coat Factory, Buy Buy Baby, Shopko and Toys R Us, as well as online outlets including Albeebaby.com, Amazon.com, Babyage.com, Babysupermart.com, Diapers.com and Target.com from January 2005 through July 2012 for between $100 and $150.

Manufactured in: China

Remedy: Consumers should contact Chicco for a free peg cover kit which will be mailed to them. To help prevent injuries before repair, consumers should store the tray on the pegs when the high chair is not in use.

Consumer Contact: For additional information, contact Chicco toll-free at (800) 807-8817 between 8 a.m. through 5 p.m. ET Monday through Friday, or visit the firm’s website at www.chiccousa.com/pollykit

Note: Health Canada’s press release is available at http://cpsr-rspc.hc-sc.gc.ca/PR-RP/recall-retrait-eng.jsp?re_id=1642

Picture of recalled high chair

Mercury Levels in Fish

Mercury Levels in Fish
July 7, 2012
Mercury Contamination in Fish
PROTECT YOURSELF AND YOUR FAMILY

The list below shows the amount of various types of fish that a woman who is pregnant or planning to become pregnant can safely eat, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. People with small children who want to use the list as a guide should reduce portion sizes. Adult men, and women who are not planning to become pregnant, are less at risk from mercury exposure but may wish to refer to the list for low-mercury choices.

Protecting yourself — and the fish: Certain fish, even some that are low in mercury, make poor choices for other reasons, most often because they have been fished so extensively that their numbers are perilously low. These fish are marked with an asterisk (read more).

Grand Canyon Uranium Mine Re-approved…!

Grand Canyon Uranium Mine Re-approved Without Re-analysis

Grand Canyon

 

 

 

 

]

Would you let a uranium mine in the Grand Canyon watershed reopen based on impact studies done two dozen years ago? The U.S. Forest Service is allowing Denison Mines Corp. to begin excavating the “Canyon Mine” — south of Grand Canyon National Park on the Kaibab National Forest — without updating its 26-year-old “environmental impact statement” looking at the mine’s impacts on surrounding lands, waters and wildlife. The Service claims no new public review or analysis is needed.

But, says the Center for Biological Diversity’s Taylor McKinnon, in fact we’ve learned plenty in the past quarter-century that could, and should, affect the decision to reopen. “We now know uranium mining threatens permanent, irretrievable damage to Grand Canyon’s watershed. This dangerous proposal should never have been approved back in 1986, and rubber-stamping it a generation later is an insult to the public, American Indian tribes and Grand Canyon National Park.”

The Canyon Mine lies within the 1 million-acre watershed where new uranium mining was banned by the Obama administration in January, after much work in and out of court by the Center and a large coalition of allies, including our supporters.

Read more in our press release and find out about our tireless defense of the Grand Canyon.

Link:  http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/public_lands/mining/Grand_Canyon_Uranium_Mining/index.html

Voluntarily Recall of Limited Quantity of 12 oz Tejava® Premium Iced Tea

Recall — Firm Press Release

FDA posts press releases and other notices of recalls and market withdrawals from the firms involved as a service to consumers, the media, and other interested parties. FDA does not endorse either the product or the company.

Voluntarily Recall of Limited Quantity of 12 oz Tejava® Premium Iced Tea

Contact:
Consumer:
1-888-847-8742

Media:
Richard Weklych
Executive Vice President of Manufacturing
707-265-3912
RichardW@CrystalGeyser.com

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – December 9, 2011 – As a precautionary measure, certain production lots of Tejava® Premium Iced Tea in 12 oz glass bottles are being recalled nationwide due to the possible presence of glass fragments which could be harmful if swallowed. To date, there have been no reports of any illness or injury.

The 12 oz Tejava® production lot code dates being recalled are:

1BT220                     1BT221                   1BT222                  1BT223
1BT252                     1BT253                   1BT254                  1BT255
1BT277                     1BT278                   1BT279                  1BT280 
1BT313

These production codes can be found on the back of the bottle label and on the long panel of the case tray. They are for case UPC 6-54871-24901-2, four pack UPC 6-54871-04901-1, and single bottle UPC 6-54871-00901-5.

Consumers who have purchased the recalled products are asked to return the product to the store where it was purchased and coupons, product replacement, or credit will be issued.

Note: The 1 liter size of Tejava® Premium Iced Tea is NOT affected and is NOT part of this recall.

For further information, consumers should contact the Tejava® Consumer Hotline at 1-888-847-8742 or www.Tejava.com 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.

###

RSS Feed for FDA Recalls Information [what's this?]

Photo: Product Labels

Recalled Product Photos Are Also Available on FDA’s Flickr Photostream.

CTV Calgary- U.S.-Canada Pipeline Gets an Initial Green Light

CTV Calgary- U.S.-Canada pipeline gets an initial green light – CTV News.

U.S.-Canada pipeline gets an initial green light

Protestors opposed to the Keystone XL pipeline hold signs outside the office of Rep. Lee Terry, R-Neb., in Omaha, Neb., Tuesday, July 26, 2011. (AP / Nati Harnik)Protestors opposed to the Keystone XL pipeline hold signs outside the office of Rep. Lee Terry, R-Neb., in Omaha, Neb., Tuesday, July 26, 2011. (AP / Nati Harnik)

Updated: Fri Aug. 26 2011 11:47:59
The Canadian Press

WASHINGTON — The U.S. State Department says TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL pipeline poses no major risks to the environment and will not spur further oilsands production in Alberta, moving the controversial project one step further to a final decision by the Obama administration.

Insisting repeatedly that its long-awaited assessment was “not a rubberstamp,” the department’s Kerri-Ann Jones said Friday there’s no evidence the pipeline will significantly impact the six U.S. states in its path as it carries crude from northern Alberta to Gulf Coast refineries in Texas.

“This is not the rubberstamp for this project,” said Jones, disputing several big American environmental groups who immediately decried it as such.

“The permit that is required for this project has not been approved or rejected at all … it should not be seen as a lean in any direction either for or against this pipeline. We are in a state of neutrality.”

Canadian officials intend to continue to develop technologies that will lessen the greenhouse gas emissions associated with oilsands production, according to the analysis.

“We are working closely with them,” Jones told a conference call in the U.S. capital. “We closely follow what’s going on in terms of international regulations in this area.”

She added that oilsands production will continue with or without the Keystone XL pipeline.

The Obama administration now has 90 days to determine whether the controversial project is in the national interest of the United States. In that determination, Jones said, State Department officials will consider the environmental assessment as well as the economic impact of the pipeline and “foreign policy concerns.”

The outcome wasn’t a surprise to the American environmental movement, for whom opposition to the pipeline has become a passionate rallying cry in the aftermath of failed climate change legislation last year.

Leading environmentalists say the State Department has refused to fully assess the risks.

The Natural Resources Defense Council accused the State Department of failing to study pipeline safety measures or examine alternate routes that would avoid the Ogallala aquifer in Nebraska, a crucial source of water in the state.

In fact, the State Department report said TransCanada needed to conduct more study, and possibly add more anti-spill precautions, around the aquifer.

Jones add that alternative routes had also been studied.

“We feel that the proposed route of the applicant is the preferred route … alternative routes were either worse or similar,” she said.

The NRDC’s Susan Casey-Lefkowitz expressed dismay at the State Department’s assessment in a statement.

“It is utterly beyond me how the administration can claim the pipeline will have ‘no significant impacts’ if they haven’t bothered to do in-depth studies around the issues of contention,” she said.

“The public has made their concerns clear and the administration seems to have ignored them. If permitted, the proposed Keystone XL tarsands pipeline will be a dirty legacy that will haunt President Obama and Secretary Clinton for years to come.”

Jim Lyon, senior vice-president of the National Wildlife Federation, said the analysis was “strike 3 for the State Department” after two “failed rounds” of environmental review and warned of legal woes ahead.

“The document still fails to address the key concerns for landowners and wildlife,” he said. “It is almost certain to be scrutinized in other venues, including a probable legal challenge. This only escalates the controversy in a process that is far from over.”

The State Department analysis comes as anti-pipeline activists continue a two-week civil disobedience campaign outside the White House.

More than 300 people, including Canadian actress Margot Kidder, have been arrested as they try to convince U.S. President Barack Obama to block the pipeline. As many as 54 more were arrested on Friday.

Environmental activists say Keystone XL is a disaster waiting to happen, pointing to several recent spills along pipelines, and are opposed to Alberta’s oilsands due to the high levels of greenhouse gas emissions involved in their production.

Proponents, meantime, say the pipeline will create thousands of jobs and help end U.S. reliance on Middle Eastern oil.

TransCanada president Russ Girling welcomed the State Department report.

“Support for Keystone XL continues to grow because the public, opinion leaders and elected officials can see the clear benefits that this pipeline will deliver to Americans,” he said in a news release.

“The fundamental issue is energy security. Through the Keystone system, the U.S. can secure access to a stable and reliable supply of oil from Canada where we protect human rights and the environment, or it can import more higher-priced oil from nations who do not share America’s interests or values.”

————————————————————————————————            Link:  http://calgary.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20110826/state-department-keystone-xl-pipeline-assessment-110826/20110826/?hub=CalgaryHome

Houston Plagued With Mosquitos, Fleas and Burst Water Pipes – ABC News

Houston Plagued With Mosquitos, Fleas and Burst Water Pipes – ABC News.

Houston Drought and Heat Wave Brings Plague of Bugs, Broken Pipes

PHOTO: A mosquito is shown in this file photo.

Houston is suffering through its worst drought in decades, and the misery is being compounded by a plague of mosquitoes carrying West Nile virus, infestations of fleas, and a cascade of bursting water pipes that are spilling the city’s precious water supply.

Most worrisome for the city is the sudden surge in the number of mosquitoes carrying West Nile.

“This summer we had an incredibly dry, very hot summer and so that will do nothing but increase the positive number of mosquitoes,” said Kristy Murray, an assistant professor at the University of Texas Health Science Center, who has studied the West Nile virus for nine years.

More than three times the number of mosquitoes as last year have tested positive for West Nile virus, according to Dr. Rudy Bueno of the Harris County Public Health & Environmental Services Mosquito Control division.

With so little water and such high temperatures, mosquitoes and birds are coming into more frequent contact as they seek out the same limited water sources. The birds, which carry West Nile, transmit the virus to the mosquitoes when the birds are bitten, Murray said.

So far only four cases of West Nile have been reported in humans this year, but Murray said she expects even more cases in her state.  (Read more)

Kahn Enterprises Recalls Beeni Baby Hats Due to Asphyxiation Hazard

Kahn Enterprises Recalls Beeni Baby Hats Due to Asphyxiation Hazard.

Kahn Enterprises Recalls Beeni Baby Hats Due to Asphyxiation Hazard

June 2, 2011

About 35 Beeni Baby Hats are being recalled because babies may spit-up while wearing, which poses an asphyxiation hazard. The recalledBeeni Baby Hats were distributed by Kahn Enterprises LLC, of Mendota Heights, MN. So far no injuries have been reported.

Description: The recalled baby hats are made of cotton and spandex. They have two straps sewn to the sides and a removable plastic pacifier holder. The hat is available in sizes small, medium and large, and in pink, blue, green, flower print, blue stripe and blue print. Model number 125867 is on a tag sewn into the back inner rim of the cap.

Sold at: Beeni Baby’s website http://www.beeni.net from January 2009 through May 2011 for about $25.

Manufactured in: United States

Remedy: Consumers should immediately stop using the hats and contact Kahn Enterprises to receive a full refund. Kahn Enterprises will provide consumers with a postage paid label to return the product. The firm is directly contacting consumers who purchased the recalled baby hats.

Consumer Contact: For additional information, email Kahn Enterprises at info@beeni-kids.com, visit the firm’s website at http://www.beeni.net or call the firm collect at (612) 310-4053.

Picture of recalled Baby Hat; The Beeni Baby Hat has been recalled due to an asphyxiation hazard The Beeni Baby Hat has been recalled due to an asphyxiation hazard

Were you affected? Click Here for a free case evaluation!

Raising Awareness about Electromagnetic Pollution

Raising Awareness about Electromagnetic Pollution.

Raising Awareness about Electromagnetic Pollution
Posted by: Dr. Mercola | February 16 2011 | 1,686 views

Electromagnetic pollution is a concern for everyone. Increasing news coverage, studies, and even new legislation are all helping educate the public on radiation risks.

One of the foremost experts in electromagnetic pollution is Camilla Rees. She has devoted herself to making people aware of the threat of electrosmog and bringing the problem into the public consciousness.

She has packaged EMF education for distribution to audiences including Congress, state legislatures, health practitioners, patients, schools, businesses, and parents.

Many experts in the field of reducing electromagnetic pollution praise and appreciate the work Camilla has done.

A two-part profile of Camilla Rees and the work she has been doing, originally published in Explore! Magazine for health professionals, has been linked below. You can read about her journey, the growing problem, and the possible solutions. According to the articles:

“[Rees says,] ‘This is a species issue … There is early evidence there may be a link between EMF exposures and autism … We know radiation is affecting our DNA and jeopardizing the health of future generations. There is research from many countries now showing dramatic decline in sperm count from exposure to cell phone radiation …

I really don’t think it’s possible, when you know the disturbing truth, to stop caring — to stop wanting to support life.’”

Sources:

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 62 other followers