Lead With The Applesauce?

Would Your Baby Like Some Lead With Her Applesauce? And How About Some Arsenic in Your Beer?

April 10, 2013

Would Your Baby Like Some Lead With Her Applesauce? And How About Some Arsenic in Your Beer?

Oh, the unwanted things that creep into our food supply.

April 10, 2013

It may take a village (and some beer; more on that soon) to raise a child. But everyone living in that child-rearing hamlet will have a different opinion about how their charge should be raised. Take the topic of first solid foods. First, when to introduce then? Four months? Six months? The debated timeframe may be narrow, but it opens up enough space to pack in a philosophy or ten edgewise.

Oh, but what of the first food itself? Should it be gruel? Pureed peas? Roast chicken, pommes dauphines and a bottle of cru Beaujolais? You could make a case for them all (sort of), but the one thing you won’t find one arguing must absolutely, categorically, you’re-baby-won’t-get-into-college-if-you-don’t-feed-her-this pick to be your kid’s first bite is this: lead.

And yet, according to a report from the Associated Press, the Environmental Law Foundation (ELF) is taking such baby-food makers as Gerber, Del Monte Food and Beech-Nut Nutrition to court in California over the undisclosed presence of low levels of lead in their products.

“[Makers of] baby foods and juices are selling products containing lead at levels that require warning labels under California Proposition 65, the Environmental Law Foundation asserts in the suit filed in Alameda County Superior Court in Oakland,” AP reports.   (Read Full Article)

FYI: Radiation Poisoning Fukushima Model

Radiation Poisoning Fukushima Model: Cesium 137 Dispersal in Pacific

March 17, 2013
Forbidden Knowledge TV
Daily Videos from the Edges of Science

Fukushima Model: Cesium 137 Dispersal in Pacific
ENVIRONS_FU'SHIMA-CLOUD
“Oh! I Wish They All Could Be California Girls”

ForbidenKnowledgeTV
Alexandra Bruce
February 20, 2013

Just in case folks on the West Coast of North America were wondering how the Fukushima disaster may be affecting your habitat over the next 10 years, here is a computer simulation, produced by the Heimholtz Center for Oceanographic Research in Germany.

It’s bad — but still not as bad as the present-day levels of radioactivity in the Baltic Sea, 36 years after the Chernobyl disaster…  (Learn more)

Nuclear Threat Within Non-Organic Food

The Invisible Nuclear Threat Within Non-Organic Food

Posted on: Saturday, November 10th 2012 at 4:15 am
Written by:

Sayer Ji, Founder

 
Beyond GMO-Free: Why We Can't Afford Not To Eat Organic

Whether you know it or or not, nuclear waste (cobalt-60) has been used for decades to make your food “safer.”

There is a profound misunderstanding in the mass market today about the value of certified organic food.  The question is not whether the 50% higher or more you pay at the register for an organic product is really worth the added vitamin, mineral and phytonutrient content you receive.  Even though organic food does usually have considerably higher nutrient density, it is not always the positive quality of what it contains that makes it so special. Rather, it is what you know the organic food does not contain, or what has not happened to it on its journey to your table, that makes buying organic a no-brainer to the educated consumer.  Let me explain.

The FDA presently supports and actively promotes the use of cobalt-60 culled from nuclear reactors as a form of “electronic pasteurization” on all domestically produced conventional food. They claim it makes the food “safer.”1 The use of euphemisms like “food additive” and “pasteurization” to describe the process of blasting food with inordinately high levels of gamma radiation can not obviate the fact that the very same death rays generated by thermonuclear warfare to destroy life are now being applied to food to “make it safer.”  This sort of Orwellian logic, e.g. WAR is PEACE, is the bread and butter of State-sponsored industry propaganda, and also informs other ostensibly “humanitarian” applications of weapons of mass instruction such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Inconceivably High Amounts of Radiation Used To “Pasteurize” Your Food

This is not a hypochondriac’s ranting, as we aren’t talking here about small amounts of radiation.  The level of gamma radiation used starts at 1 kiloGray (equivalent to 16,700,000 chest x-rays or 333 times a human lethal dose) and goes all the way up to 30 kiloGray (500,000,000 chest x-rays or 10,000 times a human lethal dose).  The following table is a list of foods that are increasingly being “nuked” for your protection.

(Read Full Article)

Warning: Salmonella in Cantaloupes, Again!!

Salmonella in cantaloupes sickens 141, kills 2

August 18, 2012
By JoNel Aleccia, NBC News

Federal and state health officials are warning consumers not to eat cantaloupe grown in southwestern Indiana after an outbreak of salmonella food poisoning that has led to 141 illnesses and two deaths in 20 states.

At least 31 people have been hospitalized in connection with infections caused by salmonella Typhimurium tied to contaminated melons, the Centers for Disease Control reported late Friday. Illnesses have been reported from July 7 to Aug. 4, although those that occurred after July 26 may not be included yet.

Investigators said cantaloupes grown in the southwestern Indiana region were the likely source of the outbreak. Kentucky laboratory officials isolated the outbreak strain from two melons collected at a retail location in that state. The deaths were reported in Kentucky.

Officials are continuing to investigate whether other types of melons may also be linked to the outbreak, the CDC said. Officials with the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration did not identify an Indiana farm where the suspect cantaloupes were grown, the distributors who handled them or the stores where the melons were sold. However, they said the farm in question has agreed to suspend sales for the rest of the growing season.

Fifty of the illnesses caused by the outbreak strain were confirmed in Kentucky, 17 were logged in Illinois and 13 in Indiana. Other states recorded fewer illnesses, with nine in Missouri; seven each in Alabama and Iowa; six each in Michigan and Tennessee; three each in Arkansas, Minnesota, North Carolina, Ohio and South Carolina; two each in California, Mississippi, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin and one each in Georgia, New Jersey and Texas.

The outbreak comes a year after listeria-tainted cantaloupe grown in Colorado sickened at least 147 people and led to at least 30 deaths.

Earlier this month, Burch Farms, a North Carolina cantaloupe grower, recalled cantaloupe and honeydew melons because of listeria contamination.

Related stories:

US RECALL NEWS

 


Treasure Hunt: The Battle Over Alaska’s Mega Mine

English: Erin McKittrick, Ground Truth Trekkin...

English: Erin McKittrick, Ground Truth Trekking, http://www.groundtruthtrekking.org, Nushagak River, draining into Bristol Bay (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Treasure Hunt: The Battle Over Alaska’s Mega Mine | FRONTLINE | PBS.
July 24, 2012

Lake Iliamna, Alaska — Rick Halford is a Manifest Destiny kind of Alaskan. He cleared his land with dynamite. He calls himself the “ideal redneck Republican.” As a longtime leader in the state legislature, he never met a hard rock mine he didn’t like.

That is, until he took a long look at the proposed Pebble Mine in southwest Alaska. It’s a phenomenal prospect, the biggest and richest in North America. But to dig a mine there is to make a Faustian bargain that involves an agonizing Alaskan twist.

In return for copper and gold worth an estimated half a trillion dollars, state and federal regulators risk poisoning what scientists describe as the last best place on earth for millions of wild salmon – and the risk from toxic mine waste would last forever.

“If God were testing us, he couldn’t have found a more challenging place,” said Halford, who helped write Alaska’s industry-friendly mining laws when he was president of the state senate.

Global mining giant Anglo-American and its Canadian partner, Northern Dynasty, want to dig one of the world’s largest open-pit mines — up to three miles wide and thousands of feet deep. They want to do it in the near-pristine watershed of Bristol Bay, home to the world’s largest sockeye salmon fishery.

No mine of this size – with huge dams for mine waste that would stand taller than the Washington Monument — has ever been developed in such an ecologically sensitive region.

The proposal has triggered partisan infighting that reaches from the Alaskan tundra to the halls of Congress, where House Republicans accuse the Obama administration of plotting a preemptive move to kill the mine.

(Read Full Article)

Environs: Rotting Sardines Block Japanese Port

NBC: Ocean stained with blood at Japanese port city — Gizmodo: “The scariest thing is that no one is sure why this is happening”; 200 tons of dead sardines (PHOTOS)

June 10, 2012

Rotting Sardines Block Japanese Port
NBC Chicago
Reena Roy
June 7, 2012

A bloody surf has turned a Japanese port city into a dumping ground for rotting fish.  Tons of sardines began washing up onto Chiba Shore in Isumi City on June 3 and continued into this week,   according to Japan Today.

The Ohara fishing port was reportedly covered with the dead fish, the ocean stained with their blood

The reason for the phenomenon has not been confirmed.

This Beach Is Made from the Blood and Bodies of 200 Tons of Dead Sardines
Gizmodo
Casey Chan
June 7, 2012

Before

In Japan, there’s a scary sight on a port in Isumi City of Chiba Prefecture. The ground has been covered by 200 tons of dead, rotting sardines and the ocean has been stained red with their blood. It looks like a beach from hell.

After

The scariest thing is that no one is sure why this is happening, some are saying it’s a lack of oxygen, others are pointing to it as an omen for another disaster.

Link:  http://enenews.com/nbc-a-bloody-surf-has-turned-a-japanese-port-city-gizmodo-ocean-stained-with-blood-of-200-tons-of-sardines-the-scariest-thing-is-that-no-one-is-sure-why-this-is-happening-photos

Big Ag’s Big Secrets: 9 Things About the Food You Eat

Big Agricultures Big Secrets: 9 Things You Need to Know About the Food You Eat

May 10, 2012

This article originally appeared on the Huffington Post. 

Thanks to factory farming’s massive economies of scale, a lot of food today is disgusting or cruel or disgusting and cruel. Just when people stopped talking about cantaloupes with deadly listeria, “pink slime” hit the news. And just when people stopped talking about pink slime, ground beef treated with ammonia to kill germs, mad cow hit the news. Does anyone even remember the arsenic in the fruit juice?

Food scandals are so costly to Big Food, it has repeatedly tried to kill the messenger rather than clean up its act. In the 1990s it pushed through “food disparagement” laws under which Oprah Winfrey herself was sued by cattlemen in 1997 (Winfrey said she would never eat a hamburger again upon learning that cows were being fed to cows). Winfrey was acquitted and cow cannibalism was made illegal but the US still lost $3 billion in beef exports when a first mad cow was discovered in 2003. April’s new mad cow will not help foreign trade.

Last year, Big Food introduced Animal Facility Interference laws in several states which make it a crime to “produce, distribute or possess photos and video taken without permission at an agricultural facility.” The bills also criminalize lying on an application to work at an agriculture facility “with an intent to commit an act not authorized by the Owner”–in an effort to stop the flow of grisly undercover videos. The first facility interference offense would be an aggravated misdemeanor but subsequent offenses could be felonies.

Of course, the Ag-Gag bills, as they were quickly dubbed, are anti-free-speech and would chill both whistle-blowers and news media (who couldn’t legally even receive non-approved farm images). The bills were scorified by CNN, the New York Times, Time magazine and First Amendment and food safety activists and, luckily, were defeated in 2011. But they are creeping back.

Many farmers and agricultural professionals are miffed that the days of “it’s-none-of-your-business” farming are over. Once upon a time, consumers cared only about the price and wholesomeness of food and didn’t worry about–or videotape–its origins and “disassembly.” Now consumers increasingly want to know how an animal lived, died, and even what it ate in between. Some of the newly engaged consumers are motivated by health, wanting to avoid hormones in milk, antibiotics in beef, arsenic in chicken, and who knows what in seafood. But many are also motivated by humane concerns. (Read Full Article)

Gulf of Mexico Dolphins Sick, Dying After BP Oil Spill

AlterNet
Gulf of Mexico Dolphins Sick, Dying After BP Oil Spill
By , Environment News Service
Posted on April 3, 2012, Printed on April 3, 2012

NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana, March 30, 2012 (ENS) – Bottlenose dolphins in Barataria Bay, Louisiana now are showing signs of severe ill health after coming in contact with oily waters from the BP oil spill nearly two years ago, warn NOAA marine mammal biologists and their local, state and federal research partners in a study released this week.

Located in the northern Gulf of Mexico, Barataria Bay, received heavy and prolonged exposure to oil during the BP/Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the spring and summer of 2010.

NOAA and its local, state and federal research partners started the Barataria Bay dolphin study in 2011 as part of the Natural Resource Damage Assessment, the process for studying the effects of the BP/Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

NOAA is sharing the preliminary results from the study so that stranding responders and veterinarians can better care for live stranded dolphins and look for similar health conditions.

Comprehensive physical examinations of 32 live dolphins from Barataria Bay conducted in the summer of 2011, a year after the spill, show that many of them were underweight, anemic, and had low blood sugar and/or symptoms of liver and lung disease.

Nearly half also have abnormally low levels of the hormones that help with stress response, metabolism and immune function.

Researchers fear that some of the study dolphins are in such poor health that they will not survive.

One of these dolphins, Y12, last observed and studied in late 2011, was found dead in January.

The carcass of Y12 was recovered on Grand Isle Beach adjacent to Barataria Bay on January 31. The visible ribs, prominent vertebrae and depressions along the back were interpreted as signs of extreme emaciation. A necropsy was performed and samples were collected to help determine cause of death and potential contributing factors.

Since February 2010, more than 675 dolphins have stranded in the northern Gulf of Mexico – from Franklin County, Florida, to the Louisiana/Texas border – a much higher rate than the usual average of 74 dolphins per year, says NOAA. The high number of strandings prompted the agency to declare an Unusual Mortality Event and investigate the cause of death for as many of the dolphins as possible.

Most of the stranded dolphins were found dead. Just 33 stranded alive and seven were taken to facilities for rehabilitation.

In the spring, it is usual to see some newborn, fetal and stillborn dolphins strand, and there has been an increase in strandings of this younger age class during this Unusual Mortality Event in 2010 and 2011.

Yet all age classes continue to strand at high levels, the scientists say.

Some waters in the northern Barataria Basin, a larger area that includes Barataria Bay, remain closed to commercial fishing, as visible oil is still present along the shoreline where the closures are in place.

NOAA and its state and federal partners are researching the many ways Gulf dolphins may have been exposed to oil, including through ingestion, inhalation or externally.

Researchers say the dolphins could have ingested oil from sediments or water while feeding or by eating whole fish, including internal organs and fluids such as liver and bile, which can harbor toxic chemicals.

Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2012. All rights reserved.

© 2012 Environment News Service All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/154823/

Pushing Back Against Dangerous Genetically Engineered Foods?

Alliance for Natural Health – USA – http://www.anh-usa.org -

Can We Succeed in Pushing Back Against Dangerous Genetically Engineered Foods?

Posted By ANH-USA On February 14, 2012 @ 2:00 pm In International

GMO-free [1]Yes! There are more and more anti-GMO campaigns across the country—with your help this effort can succeed.

Genetically engineered food is the biggest uncontrolled experiment ever conducted on humans. Nearly all of our processed food contains genetically engineered ingredients. A handful of biotechnology companies dominate the US market and claim there is no safety risk to consumers, animals, or the environment. The evidence suggests quite the opposite. Remember the animal studies that showed sterility by the third generation [2]?

We’ve partnered with numerous campaigns and combined efforts to stop the GE food take over of our food supply. All of us need to keep taking action to support these campaigns. The federal government, no matter which party is in power, is unwilling or unable to stand up to the GE industry, so citizens must do it instead. The only reason major food manufacturers stopped contaminating the European food supply with GE food sources was because European citizens voiced their objection to GMO in massive numbers. (Learn more)

« Older entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 62 other followers