Notable Foodborne Illness Outbreaks of 2011

Notable Foodborne Illness Outbreaks of 2011.

Notable Foodborne Illness Outbreaks of 2011

by Janice Boase | Dec 30, 2011
In my job over at Outbreak Database, I have been keeping track of foodborne illness outbreaks – small and large – over the last 12 months. Here are some of the more interesting:

Don Julio Mexican Restaurant December 2011 – 59 ill. A salmonellosis outbreak was linked to eating at the Don Julio’s Mexican Restaurant in Corinth, Mississippi. A food producer or supplier did not appear to be the cause. The food vehicle and the contributing factors were not described as of December 16.

Hannaford Hamburger Ground Beef December 2011 – 16 ill.  On December 16, Hannaford, a Scarborough, Maine-based grocery chain, recalled fresh ground beef products that may have been contaminated with a strain of Salmonella Typhimurium. The recall resulted from an investigation into human illness. By December 20, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported 16 ill persons with an indistinguishable pulse field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern. Eleven of those individuals reported consuming ground beef. Seven individuals were hospitalized. Ten of the 14 case-patients reported purchasing ground beef at Hannaford stores in Maine, New York, New Hampshire and Vermont between October 12 and November 20. The Salmonella Typhimurium was resistant to several commonly used antibiotics.

raw-milk14-featured.jpg

Organic Pastures Unpasteurized, Raw Milk November 2011 – 5 ill.  Raw milk products produced by Organic Pastures were recalled and quarantined by the state of California after five children drank Organic Pastures raw milk and were infected with the same strain of E. coli O157:H7. The children were residents of Contra Costa, Kings, Sacramento, and San Diego counties. The only common food exposure was the unpasteurized raw milk. Laboratory sampling failed to detect E. coli O157:H7. The recall was ordered strictly on the basis of the epidemiologic findings of the California Department of Public Health, which concluded that Organic Pastures was the likely source of the outbreak. Organic Pastures was implicated in an earlier outbreak of E. coli O157:H7, in 2006; the E. coli O157:H7 associated with this outbreak was different than the strain implicated in 2006.
Cozy Vale Creamery Raw, Unpasteurized Milk Products November 2011 – 3 ill.  Cozy Vale Creamery’s raw milk products were recalled due to their link to an outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 in Washington state that began in August. Cozy Vale Creamery’s whole and skim milk and cream were distributed through seven retail outlets in Pierce, Thurston and King counties. The recalled products had sell-by dates of December 6 or earlier. The Washington State Department of Agriculture discovered that locations in the milking parlor and processing areas were contaminated with the outbreak strain of E. coli O157:H7 bacteria. The milk products were sold at the farm store and at Marlene’s Market in Tacoma, two Olympia Food Co-Op locations in Olympia, Olympia Local Foods in Tumwater, Yelm Co-op in Yelm, Mt. Community Co-op in Eatonville and Marlene’s Market in Federal Way. Retail raw milk is legal in Washington state.  (Read more)

News From The Journals Of The American Society For Microbiology

News From The Journals Of The American Society For Microbiology
Compound in Apples Inhibits E. coli O157:H7

A compound that is abundant in apples and strawberries inhibits the highly pathogenic E. coli O157:H7 biofilms while sparing a beneficial strain of E. coli that also forms biofilms in the human gut, according to a paper in the December 2011 issue of the journal Infection and Immunology.

Transcriptome analysis revealed that the compound, called phloretin, suppresses toxin and other genes involved in O157:H7 pathology and biofilm formation. And in a rat model of colitis, phloretin, reduced colon inflammation and body weight loss. “Phloretin has a triple biological activity as an antioxidant compound, a biofilm inhibitor, and an anti-inflammatory agent,” says corresponding author Jintae Lee of Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Korea.

E. coli O157:H7 causes hemorrhages in the intestine. To date, no effective therapy for O157:H7 biofilms has been found. Biofilms generally are notoriously resistant to antimicrobial therapy. So in the study, Lee screened a dozen flavonoids, including phloretin, for their ability to inhibit these biofilms. “We found that phloretin markedly reduced E. coli O157:H7 biofilm formation on abiotic surface and human colon epithelial cells, while phloretin did not harm commensal E. coli K-12 biofilms,” says Lee. Commensal E. coli can actually fortify the human immune system, he says.

In addition to its anti- E. coli O157:H7 biofilm activity, phloretin “accounts in part for the antioxidant capacity of apples, and it also shows anti-inflammatory activity,” says Lee. “This study suggests that phloretin in apples could reduce the risk of E. coli O157:H7 infection and intestinal inflammation.”

“This study demonstrated for the first time that phloretin, a natural flavonoid, is a nontoxic inhibitor of enterohemorrhagic E. coli O157:H7 biofilms, but does not harm commensal E. coli K-12 biofilms,” Lee writes. “Also, importantly, our results confirmed that phloretin shows anti-inflammatory properties in both the in vitro and in vivo inflammatory colitis models. The effect of phloretin was noticeably more pronounced than that of the conventional [inflammatory bowel disease] drug 5-aminosalicylic acid.”

———————————————————————————————–
(J.-H. Lee, S.C. Regmi, J.-A. Kim, M.H. Cho, H. Yun, C.-S. Lee, and J. Lee, 2011. Apple flavonoid phloretin inhibits Escherichia coli O157:H7 biofilm formation and ameliorates colon inflammation in rats. Infect. Immun. 79:4819-4827.)

———————————————————————————————-

Article Link:  http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/239400.php

US Govt Asks Scientists To Keep Lab-Bred Bird Flu Blueprint Secret

Medical News Today
US Govt Asks Scientists To Keep Lab-Bred Bird Flu Blueprint Secret
21 Dec 2011

Imagine this, our worst nightmare becomes our reality: as anticipated, the deadly H5N1 bird flu virus that kills most people it infects has acquired the ability to transmit easily from bird to human and then from human to human and has reached pandemic proportions. But, the origin of the outbreak isn’t a naturally evolved strain, but one created in a research lab, with all the best intentions.

This is not the plot for a new movie, but a real threat the US goverment says it is currently trying to avert when this week it asked scientists who have recently created a strain of H5N1 avian influenza that transmits easily in ferrets (whose response to flu is remarkably similar to ours) not to reveal all of its genetic blueprint when they publish the result of their studies.

But, the move has heated up the debate about where you draw such a line, since, while no-one wants bio-terrorists to get hold of such a recipe, if researchers can’t pool their knowledge then we hamper their ability to give us the best chance of averting or surviving a pandemic of a flu with a high kill rate.

According to a statement from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) released on Tuesday 20 December, the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB), an independent committee of experts that advises various US government departments and federal agencies, recently completed a review of two unpublished studies describing research on the transmissibility of H5N1 that was funded by the NIH.

The studies, one from Europe and one from the US, describe how researchers genetically engineered strains of H5N1 with enhanced capacity to spread in animals, in order to assess how easy it would be for the naturally occurring virus to mutate into easily transmissible forms. And they concluded that contrary to current thinking, the virus has a greater potential to “gain a dangerous capacity to be transmitted among mammals, including perhaps humans” than we thought.

The studies also describe some of the genetic changes that would have to take place for the virus to realize this potential.

Following their review, the NSABB recommended that the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) asks the study authors and the editors of the two journals that the studies are due to be published in, Science and Nature, make changes to their manuscripts such that, as the NIH statement reports:

“… the general conclusions highlighting the novel outcome be published, but that the manuscripts not include the methodological and other details that could enable replication of the experiments by those who would seek to do harm.”

They also recommended that the study reports include more information on the goals and the public health benefits of the research, and the extensive health and safety measures that were taken to protect the lab workers and the public.

The HHS has apparently agreed that this should be done and passed on these requests, which are non-binding, to the authors and editors.

The NIH says the studies are very important, and the general results should be published so that the research community can start developing ways to rapidly detect strains that show the naturally occurring virus is getting closer to a form that could cross more easily from birds to humans.

In the meantime, the US government says it will set up a mechanism where those with a “legitimate need” for the full information are allowed secure access to it.

Dr. Amy Patterson, science policy director at the NIH told the Associated Press that the authors were going ahead with the changes to their manuscripts.

But the journal editors appear to have some misgivings about how straightforward this might be.

Science’s Editor-in-Chief Bruce Alberts said they would be “evaluating how best to proceed”.

He said their response will depend very much on how the US government intends to implement the secure access to the omitted information. For instance how transparent the written down plan is, and how it will ensure that:

“… any information that is omitted from the publication will be provided to all those responsible scientists who request it, as part of their legitimate efforts to improve public health and safety”.

Nature’s Editor-in-Chief Philip Campbell described the NSABB recommendation to restrict public access to data as “unprecedented” although he and his editors recognize the motivation behind it.

“It is essential for public health that the full details of any scientific analysis of flu viruses be available to researchers. We are discussing with interested parties how, within the scenario recommended by NSABB, appropriate access to the scientific methods and data could be enabled,” he added.

However, there are also those in the scientific community who argue that all this is too late, and is a case of trying to close the barn door after the horse has bolted.

Biodefence expert Richard Ebright from Rutgers University in Piscataway, New Jersey, told Nature News that the “horse is out of the barn”: the results will already have been seen by many scientists and most likely will soon be all over the scientific grapevine.

Others say it’s the wrong debate anyway: since further research on these strains is now inevitable, what we should be talking about is how to ensure these pathogens don’t escape from the labs that are currently holding them or will be working on them in the future. It’s more a question of biosafety protection than security of information.

And of that we have real examples. In the last ten years we have already seen how severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) strains infected staff at supposedly sufficiently secure labs in China, Taiwan and Singapore.

Michael Osterholm heads the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy in Minneapolis, and is a member of the NSABB. He says if SARS or something similar gets out it has limited potential for transmission on a global basis. But flu is different:

“Influenza presents a very difficult challenge because if it ever were to escape, it is one that would quickly go round the world,” he told Nature News.

Written by Catharine Paddock PhD
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Article URL: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/239510.php

Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.

Treating Cancer With Nutrition? What Doctors Are Doing Right Now!

naturalnews.com
Originally published December 1 2011
Can you treat cancer with nutrition? Here’s what doctors are doing right now
by Tara Green

(NaturalNews) While the majority of the cancer establishment continues to seek a magic bullet pharmaceutical cure for cancer, another group of physicians has been taking a fresh look at the concept of a nutritional cure. It turns out that preventing, or even reversing, some forms of cancer may involve not the development of expensive drugs, but something as natural as sunshine.

In the Lab
In a laboratory study JoEllen Welsh, a researcher with the State University of New York at Albany, took human breast cancer cells and treated them with a potent form of vitamin D. The cancer cells shriveled and died within a few days of exposure to megadoses of “the sunshine vitamin.”

“Vitamin D enters the cells and triggers the cell death process,” said Welsh. She described the processes as “similar to when we treat cells with Tamoxifren [anti-cancer drug which causes adverse reactions in many women].” Researchers repeated the petri-dish experiment in mice, injecting them first with breast cancer cells and then with Vitamin D. After several weeks, the cancer tumors in the mice shrank by 50 percent. (Read Full Article)

Build-A-Bear Recalls Nearly 300,000 Teddy Bears

Build-A-Bear recalls nearly 300,000 teddy bears

By the CNN Wire Staff
updated 5:58 PM EST, Wed December 28, 2011
The Build-A-Bear Workshop company is recalling nearly 300,000 Colorful Hearts Teddy Bears sold in the U.S. and Canada.
The Build-A-Bear Workshop company is recalling nearly 300,000 Colorful Hearts Teddy Bears sold in the U.S. and Canada.

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Build-A-Bear Workshop recalls 284,000 teddy bears in the U.S. and 13,200 in Canada
  • The company recall is because of risks of choking on the bears’ eyes
  • The Chinese-made stuffed-animal toy is roughly 16 inches high with black plastic eyes
  • It is is sold in the United States for $18

(CNN) — The Build-A-Bear Workshop company is recalling nearly 300,000 Colorful Hearts Teddy Bears sold in the United States and Canada due to risks of choking, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission has announced.

The agency warned that while no injuries have been reported, the “teddy bear’s eyes could loosen and fall out, posing a choking hazard to children,” according to a statement.

“Consumers should immediately take the recalled teddy bear from children and return it to any Build-A-Bear store to receive a coupon for any available stuffed animal from Build-A-Bear,” the statement said, advising buyers to contact the firm at 866-236-5683 with additional questions.

The Chinese-made toy is a stuffed animal, roughly 16 inches tall with black plastic eyes, that is sold in the United States for $18.

The bears were sold at Build-A-Bear Workshops and through the firm’s website from April through December.

Article Link:  http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/28/us/teddy-bear-recall/index.html?eref=mrss_igoogle_cnn

When Good Food Goes Bad: 12 Rotten Food Signs | eHow.com

When Good Food Goes Bad: 12 Rotten Food Signs | eHow.com.

When Good Food Goes Bad: 12 Rotten Food Signs

The nose knows. We may not use the sense for hunting anymore, but smell is a great indicator of food spoilage.
Viewing 1 of 14

No one wants to start their day with a case of food poisoning. Different foods go bad at different rates and in different ways, and though chemists are working on developing a “dipstick” test that will immediately detect disease-causing bacteria in foods, for now the safest bet is to stick to the adage, “When in doubt, throw it out.” If you’re on the fence about the freshness of a particular food, the last thing you want to try is a taste test, because a single bite of rancid food could land you in the hospital.

Hemera Technologies/AbleStock.com/Getty Images

Read more: When Good Food Goes Bad: 12 Rotten Food Signs | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/slide-show_12142176_good-food-goes-bad-12-rotten-food-signs.html#ixzz1hsK4Qpc7

Recalls, Market Withdrawals, & Safety Alerts: Winn-Dixie Issues Voluntary Recall on Bulk Gummy Bears

Recalls, Market Withdrawals, & Safety Alerts > Winn-Dixie Issues Voluntary Recall on Bulk Gummy Bears.

 

Winn-Dixie Issues Voluntary Recall on Bulk Gummy Bears
December 27, 2011
Safety

-
Recall — Firm Press Release

FDA posts press releases and other notices of recalls and market withdrawals from the firms involved as a service to consumers, the media, and other interested parties. FDA does not endorse either the product or the company.
Winn-Dixie Issues Voluntary Recall on Bulk Gummy Bears

Contact:  Consumer:
1.866.WINN-DIXIE (866.946.6349)

Media:
Eric Barnes
904-370-7715
904-571-6052 (cell)
EricBarnes@winn-dixie.com

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – December 14, 2011 – Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. (NASDAQ: WINN), is voluntarily recalling Sunrise Assorted Flavor Gummy Bears sold in the self-serve bulk area of select store produce departments between November 14 and December 13 due to a remote possibility of metal contamination.

The gummy bears included in this recall have been sold in five Winn-Dixie stores in Florida and Louisiana:

St. Johns Commons – 2220 County Road 210 W, Jacksonville, FL 32259
Concord Shopping Mall – 11241 S.W. 40th Street, Miami, FL 33165
Pepper Tree Plaza – 5600 West Sample Road, Margate, FL 33073
Main Street Square – 7800 S. hwy 17-92, Fern Park, FL 32730
70431 Hwy 21, Covington, LA 70433

The recall is being initiated out of an abundance of caution for consumer safety, though the company has received no reports of illness associated with product consumption.

“We encourage guests with any concerns to return the product for a full refund, no questions asked,” said Mary Kellmanson, Winn-Dixie’s group vice president of marketing.

Consumers with questions about the recalled product may contact the Winn-Dixie Guest Service Center toll free at 1.866.WINN-DIXIE (866.946.6349).

About Winn-Dixie

Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. is one of the nation’s largest food retailers. Founded in 1925, the Company is headquartered in Jacksonville, Fla. The Company currently operates approximately 480 retail grocery locations and approximately 380 in-store pharmacies in Florida, Alabama, Louisiana, Georgia and Mississippi. For more information, please visit http://www.winn-dixie.com.

###
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm283665.htm

Petition: Don’t Let Big Coal Destroy Bryce Canyon National Park!

Don’t Let Big Coal Destroy Bryce Canyon National Park! – The Petition Site.

Don’t Let Big Coal Destroy Bryce Canyon National Park! 

Don't Let Big Coal Destroy Bryce Canyon National Park!

  • Target: Keith Rigtrup, Bureau of Land Management, Kanab Office
  • Sponsored by: Sierra Club

Big Coal and the City of Los Angeles are threatening Bryce Canyon National Park.  They’ve proposed building a 3,500 acre coal strip mine right next to the park to extract coal to power L.A.   If built, the mine would turn southern Utah into an industrial zone — jeopardizing the park, tourism, and the health of local residents.

Instead of destroying a national park to create dirty energy from coal, the sun-drenched city of Los Angeles should create its own solar energy.  Right now, the Bureau of Land Management (LBM) is accepting your comments on the strip mine proposal.

Tell the BLM to stop this dirty, dangerous proposal and protect the Bryce Canyon region for future generations.

The Dark Side of Reforestation Programs: Planting 7,000 Trees a Day in Brutal Conditions | | AlterNet

The Dark Side of Reforestation Programs: Planting 7,000 Trees a Day in Brutal Conditions | | AlterNet.


The Dark Side of Reforestation Programs: Planting 7,000 Trees a Day in Brutal Conditions

“78 Days,” a compelling documentary by Canadian filmmaker and former tree planter Jason Nardella,
Reforestation and tree planting is a tricky topic for many environmentalists. Every year, several billion trees are harvested for fuel, construction and paper products. While alternative products like hemp and bamboo can solve part of the problem, as can recycling paper products, curbing the effects of the behemoth logging industry takes time and resources. For ordinary people concerned about deforestation, it doesn’t take much to buy some carbon offset credits or a voucher to replace a tree or two. But it takes an extraordinary amount of resources to actually plant and nurture all those new trees. And behind the scenes of every good faith voucher purchase is a whole other industry focused on regrowth — not always with optimal results that actually reduce CO2 levels.

Some critics also argue that carbon offsets, or taking steps to neutralize our carbon footprint, can be ineffective or even harmful because they are only a short-term solution. Others contend that all carbon emissions are not created equal. Burning fossil fuels simply can’t be compared with biological tree carbon. All of this controversy doesn’t even take into account how carbon offset programs — let alone the simple demand for lumber — could potentially be fueling the grueling work conditions for tree planters.

78 Days, a compelling documentary by Canadian filmmaker and former tree planter Jason Nardella, reveals the dark side of reforestation labor. Nardella focused his lens on a 2008 tree planting crew in remote northern Alberta. Over the course of four short months, the small crew of mostly veteran hardworking planters was tasked with planting an astounding 10 million trees regardless of climate or injury. It wasn’t some sort of unusually intense planting season. On the contrary, these planters toil every summer planting season under such extreme conditions and deadlines.

It’s worth noting that the extreme conditions associated with the tree planting season are documented online if you go searching for planter diaries or warnings about the potential dangers of the job on tree planting job boards. What Nardella depicts isn’t atypical, especially in the remote upper regions of the Canadian wilderness. (Read Full Article)

ARGENTINA: Poison from the Sky – IPS ipsnews.net

ARGENTINA: Poison from the Sky – IPS ipsnews.net.

ARGENTINA
Poison from the Sky
By Marcela Valente


BUENOS AIRES, Dec 9, 2011 (IPS) – Argentina’s soy boom has been a major source of foreign exchange. But the other side of the coin is the toxic effects among the rural population, from spraying agrochemicals.

Research by the National University of Río Cuarto in the northwestern province of Córdoba demonstrated that glyphosate, the herbicide used on transgenic soy crops, causes genetic damage in mice and amphibians, like frogs.

Two years ago, another research study by Andrés Carrasco, a professor at the Molecular Embryology Laboratory of the University of Buenos Aires School of Medicine and principal researcher at the National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET), also demonstrated damage in amphibians.

Genetically modified (GM) soy seeds, approved amid controversy in the 1990s for use in Argentina, were developed by the U.S.-based multinational biotechnology corporation Monsanto to be resistant to glyphosate, the active principle in the “Roundup” herbicide sold by the company.

Introduction of the GM seeds launched an expansion of soy cultivation and increased use of glyphosate. Today, 18 million hectares are planted to soy, out of a total of nearly 30 million hectares of all kinds of grain crops.

Sales of “Roundup” herbicide, which contains glyphosate and other ingredients that aid its absorption by plants, soared dramatically from one million litres a year in the 1990s to nearly 300 million litres a year today, according to official figures.

In 2006, a group of NGOs with access to medical reports from provinces where soy cultivation was expanding, launched the “Stop the Spraying” (“Paren de Fumigar”) campaign, which managed to get an official commission created to look into the reports of health damages.

But the commission produced no results, and Monsanto insists that, with proper precautions, the herbicide is not toxic.

Delia Aiassa, a biologist in the Genetics and Environmental Mutagenesis group at the Natural Sciences Department of the University of Río Cuarto, leads a research team studying the impact of glyphosate on health.

The expert explained that exposure to glyphosate can cause asthma, chronic bronchitis, skin and eye irritation, damage to the kidneys, liver and nervous system, cancer, developmental problems in children and birth defects.

She also said that pregnant women are at greater risk of miscarriage, and in men fertility problems are more frequent, if they are exposed to the chemical.

Recently Aiassa published the results of her experiments in mice and amphibians, and her research team has carried out surveys in repeatedly sprayed areas which demonstrated the impact the herbicide has on human health.

Aiassa told IPS that mice and amphibians treated with glyphosate, in its pure form or as the commercial herbicide, mixed with additives, “had increased genetic damage to blood cells, bone marrow and liver.” At higher doses, the animals died.

At the request of small towns in Córdoba that are surrounded by soy plantations, the multidisciplinary team carried out “human monitoring” to study the use of herbicides and pesticides from the vantage point of those directly involved.

In Rincón de los Sauces, in Córdoba, where 34 families are surrounded by large soy fields, 34 percent of respondents said that the area round their homes was repeatedly sprayed.

Fifty-three percent of those interviewed said they had never received any information about risks posed by the misuse of agrochemicals, and 35 percent reported symptoms of poisoning (of whom 83 percent worked as sprayers in the fields).

Similar results were obtained by the team in other small towns like Las Vertientes, Marcos Juárez and Saria in the same province. The experts also found “a lack of medical records reflecting the ailments experienced by local residents.”

This shortcoming was highlighted by Dr Damián Verzeñassi, academic under-secretary of the School of Medical Sciences at the National University of Rosario, in the northeastern province of Santa Fe.

Aiassa and Verzeñassi gave a talk for health workers Dec. 6 at the Juan Garrahan Paediatric Hospital in Buenos Aires, where severely ill children from all over the country are treated.

“One cannot keep thinking about human health as though it were unconnected with the health of ecosystems,” Verzeñassi said in his talk, warning of the health effects of a model of production based on large-scale production of transgenic soy.

Verzeñassi told IPS that because some health impacts only appear a considerable time after exposure to an agricultural chemical, it as essential for doctors in affected areas – and at the Garrahan hospital – to keep patient records.

“Case-based reasoning is a key tool in these situations, but it requires reliable case histories from which to gather data to visibilise the problem,” the doctor from Rosario told his colleagues.

IPS asked him about the trial to be held next year in Córdoba province against two agribusiness producers and the pilot of a crop duster plane, for illegal spraying of glyphosate in the vicinity of the village of Ituzaingó and for damages caused to the local population.

In Verzeñassi’s view, the trial is “very important” to establish criminal responsibility in the case. He regretted that a group of women from Ituzaingó had to push hard for prosecution to go ahead, instead of the public health system performing that duty.

In spite of loud demands, there is no national law to regulate agricultural chemicals in Argentina. There are regulations in the provinces and in some municipalities, which are permissive to different degrees and are not always enforced.

Among the doctors attending the talk was the head of Oncology at the Garrahan hospital, Pedro Zubizarreta. He told IPS that one-third of the country’s child cancer cases – usually the most severe – come for treatment to the Garrahan.

“We can’t prove an increase in cancer cases associated with glyphosate use, because we don’t have enough detailed records, but what matters is that an agricultural chemical that causes harm is being used on a massive scale,” he said.

“We might not be able to demonstrate today that this causes more child cancer, but we do know it is bad for our health and that of our children, and it has an enormous effect on biodiversity and the variety of our foods,” he stressed.

The concern expressed by doctors and scientists echoed those of people in Chaco province in the northeast, where IPS covered a debate among the participants at a Women’s Hearing for Climate Justice, held in October, which focused on agricultural chemicals.

“They ruin the earth; people around here can’t plant any crops because they all wither. They spray toxic chemicals alongside our crops, and the wind burns them all up,” Juana Ozuna of the small farmers’ organisation in Colonias Unidas, Chaco province, told IPS at that event.

“We don’t have much education, but we can see that it does harm, because we can’t keep animals or have a vegetable garden, the water is polluted and there are pitiful cases of deformed babies,” she concluded. (END)

Article Link: http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=106159

« Older entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 62 other followers