Alarming New Fukushima Reports

Alarming New Fukushima Reports.

  UK USA WMD Asia Europe Health Environment Australia

Alarming New Fukushima Reports

Posted: 2011/04/18
From: Mathaba
Five weeks after Japan’s disaster, reports suggest worse, not improved
conditions. It portends serious regional and global trouble ahead,
besides what’s already happened.

by Stephen Lendman
On April 16, AP headlined, “Radioactivity Rises in Sea Off Japan Nuclear Plant,” saying:”Levels of radioactivity have risen sharply in seawater near (Fukushima),signaling the possibility of new leaks at the facility, the government said Saturday.”

The announcement followed a 5.9 level aftershock rocking the country early Saturday. So far, no additional damage reports were issued. However, seawater radioactive Iodine-131 spiked to 6,500 times above normal, up from 1,100 times Friday, and Cesium-134 and 137 rose nearly fourfold.

Japan’s Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) raised the possibility of worrisome new leaks, admitting that tracking them is difficult. Nonetheless, they still claim no
threat to humans or sea life despite numerous independent experts raising dire warnings of spreading global radiation, including plutonium, the most deadly substance known, a microscopic speck enough to cause cancer.

Japan’s Kyodo News reported the same news, saying  pumping water into reactors and storage pools created large contaminated puddles with high radiation levels inside the reactor containment and turbine buildings. As a result, restoration work is hampered because even short-term exposure is extremely hazardous.

On April 14, Global Security Newswire (GSN) headlined “Japan Plant Emits More Radiation After Cooling Lapse,” saying:

The increased radiation explained above “indicates the fuel in storage there had been compromised,” suggesting worse trouble than so far reported.

On April 15, GSN headlined, “Japan Plant Fuel Melted Partway Through Reactors,” saying:

It settled into lower sections of containment vessels, “raising the specter of overheated material compromising a container and causing a massive radiation release,” according to a newly released Atomic Energy Society of Japan (AESJ) report.

On April 15, Japan Times writer Kanako Takahara headlined, “Fuel rod fragments at bottom of vessels,” saying:

“If too many….puddle at the bottom, they can generate enough concentrated heat to bore a hole in the pressure vessel, which would result in a massive radioactive release to the environment.” In fact, there’s no assurance it hasn’t already happened but isn’t being reported.

Downplaying a serious reactor breach, AESJ claimed only small amounts of fuel so
far melted and dispersed uniformly across the lower sections of Units 1, 2 and 3. Minimally, months of restoration work lie ahead, perhaps years based on what’s already known. According to some experts, we’re in unchartered territory, dealing with a unprecedented disaster.

On April 13, on Democracy Now, Physics Professor Michio Kaku called Fukushima reactors “ticking time bombs,” saying Tokyo Electric (TEPCO) “has been in denial, trying to downplay the full impact of this nuclear disaster.”

He explained a mathematical formula to determine an accident’s level, saying this one “already released something on the order of 50,000 trillion becquerels of radiation,” warranting a Level 7 rating.

However, radiation keeps leaking. “The situation is not stable at all. So, you’re looking at basically a ticking time bomb.” The slightest disturbance causing more damage could increase the disaster’s magnitude manyfold.

He described a full core meltdown this way:

“Think of driving a car, and….all of a sudden (it) lunges out of control.
You hit the brakes,” but they don’t work because “the earthquake wiped
out the safety systems.”

“Then your radiator starts to heat up
and explodes. That’s the hydrogen gas explosion. And then, to make it
worse, the gas tank is heating up, and all of a sudden your whole car
(bursts into) flames. That’s (a) full-scale meltdown.”

“So what can you do? You drive the car into a river (what TEPCO did by using seawater to cover the) top of the core.” But its salt corrodes the
radiator. So what then? “You call out the local firemen” and use
“Japanese samurai warriors” inside the plant on a suicide mission,
trying to keep water over “melted nuclear reactor cores.”

That’s the current situation. So when TEPCO says things are stable, it’s only “in the sense that you’re dangling from a cliff hanging by your fingernails. And as the time goes by, each fingernail starts to crack.  That’s the situation now,” extremely dangerous and uncertain.

Moreover, radiation contaminates air, water and soil. “Cows then eat the vegetation, create milk, and then it winds up in the milk. Farmers are now dumping milk right on their farms because it’s too radioactive. Foods (also) have to be impounded in the area.”

So “let’s be blunt about this: would you buy food that says ‘Made in Chernobyl?’
Japanese people are saying: “Should I buy food that says ‘Made in Fukushima?’ We’re talking about the collapse of the local economy. (Yet) the government tries to lowball all the numbers, downplay the severity of the accident, and that’s making it much worse.”

Further, Japan’s limited evacuation zone is “pathetic.” America recommended 50 miles for US personnel, and France advised their nationals to consider leaving Japan altogether.

Moreover, radiation levels are rising far beyond the evacuation zone. Expect large future cancer increases. “That’s the inevitable consequence of releasing enormous” amounts of radiation into the environment.

As for TEPCO and government officials, “(t)hey’re literally making it up as they go along. We’re in totally uncharted territory. You get any nuclear engineering book. Look at the last chapter, and this scenario is not contained in….any nuclear engineering textbook on” the planet.

As a result, “we are the guinea pigs for this science experiment that’s taking place. Then it could take up to 10 years to finally dismantle the reactor. The last stage is entombment….over a period of many years….in a gigantic slab of concrete.”

Other concerns include sea water radiation “millions of times beyond legal levels” and
radiation readings throughout much of the country, including Tokyo drinking water. Concerned people wonder if they should leave. Some “are voting with their feet. A lot of people are voluntarily evacuating from Tokyo “because they simply don’t believe….consistently lowballed”TEPCO and government radiation level reports.

Kaku also said people, including Americans, aren’t told the truth about nuclear power
hazards. Now a new generation may be built at risk of meltdowns like older reactors. In fact, the potential for nuclear disaster is so great that insurers won’t underwrite it, so Washington under thePrice-Anderson Act does it at taxpayer expense for an energy source too dangerous to exist.

As a result, noted experts like
Helen Caldicott warn of inevitable disasters as great or worse than
Fukushima, the more operating plants, the greater the danger.

On April 12, her London Guardian article headlined, “How Nuclear Apologists Mislead the World Over Radiation,” saying:

It”emanates from radioactive elements which enter the body by inhalation,
ingestion, or skin absorption. Hazardous radionuclides (like)
Iodine-131, Cesium-137, and other isotopes….bio-concentrate at each
step of various food chains,” from algae to crustaceans to small fish to
bigger fish to animals to humans, as well as vegetation.

They then affect specific bodily organs, including the thyroid, liver, bone
and brain, “where they continuously irradiate small volumes of cells
with high doses of alpha, beta and/or gamma radiation, and over many
years, can induce uncontrolled cell replication.”

That’s cancer!

In addition, nuclides stay radioactive for generations, causing increased incidences of cancer and genetic diseases. There’s no such thing as an acceptable radiation level. In any amount, radiation is harmful, cumulative, permanent and unforgiving.

Experts also worry about possible re-criticality, defined as a return to a point at
which a nuclear reaction becomes self-sustaining or unstoppable. In late March, the IAEA warned that “(t)here might be re-criticality at Fukushima,” though so far there’s “no final assessment.”

On April 11, environmental expert Dr. Ilya Perlingieri’s article headlined, “Fukushima’s Nuclear Disaster: One Month and Counting,”saying:

So far, “(n)othing is even remotely improved. In fact, things are dramatically worse.” Hazardous reactors like GE’s Mark 1 place entire populations at risk where they operate. “The radioactive consequences of” four Fukushima reactors “far exceed(s) Chernobyl.”

As a result, the consequences for all Japanese residents will be enormous. But they also affect others as “various radioactive elements travel (by wind and water) around the globe.” Potentially, everyone may be
affected to a greater or lesser extent, including future generations.

In
addition, dumping thousands of tons of radioactive water into the ocean
is an environmental crime. Contaminated water “will now travel across
the (Pacific) to North America’s West Coast,” contaminating the entire
food chain in the process.

Then, as “water goes through its cycles, it will evaporate, and radioactive air will be
carried around the globe. We are all in grave danger.”

Moreover, because EPA closed many of its monitoring stations, including on the West Coast, the public won’t get vital information. “How much more deception and deceit can we take?” Fukushima is the worst disaster “we have faced in our lives.” Potentially millions of cancer may result.

How many people are already “eating radioactive fresh fruit, or drinking water and milk? High radiation levels have been found in rain, snow, and drinking water. Radioactive Iodine-131 and Cesium-137 have been foundin US milk.”

Perlingieri quoted from Dr. Janette Sherman’s “prophetic scientific paper” written six months before Fukushima, saying:

“Given profound weather effects (earthquakes, floods, tsunamis, etc.), human fallibility, and military conflicts, (it’s) only a matter of time before
there is a nuclear disaster. Nuclear fallout knows no state or national
boundaries….The economic costs of radioactive pollution and care of
contaminated citizens are staggering. No country can maintain itself if
its citizens are economically, intellectually, politically, and socially
impoverished.”

Nor can it if the health of its people is gravely, preventably, and permanently harmed. Nature’s laws can’t be reversed, nor can the effects of contaminating radiation, a destroyer of life too dangerous to exist, but it proliferates because corrupted politicians and industry profiteers are too unprincipled to stop it.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network
Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.
#

Survey: Consumers Want More Prompt Recall Information

Survey: Consumers Want More Prompt Recall Information.

Survey: Consumers Want More Prompt Recall Information

April 29, 2011

Consumers want more information from more resources in order to get timely and detailed information about product recalls, according to a new study by Deloitte LLP.

The 2011 Consumer Food and Product Insight Survey found that although shoppers still think manufacturers and government entities should be responsible for communicating recall details, Internet access and social media are increasing consumers’ reliance on advocacy groups and website like www.usrecallnews.com; however, they are also turning to their peers for timely recall information.

“Consumers want checks and balances in the information they receive and are insisting on a greater level of transparency about the safety, ingredients and origin of products. So, they’re turning to advocacy groups and peers as trusted sources,” said Pat Conroy, vice chairman, Deloitte LLP and US consumer products practice leader. ”This is a wake-up call for consumer products companies; they need to get ahead of this shift and work more directly with consumers to build brand advocates and stronger customer relationships.”

Those consumers who participated in the survey primarily said they hold manufacturers responsible for communicating with them regarding recalls. Of the respondents, 73 percent placed the responsibility on manufacturers while 69 percent said government entities should be accountable for communicating recall details.

Deloitte’s study also found that Internet access and social media are driving consumers to advocacy groups for timely recall information. This has increased to 35 percent compared to 23 percent in the previous year’s survey. They are also consulting more frequently with their peers for information — up to 27 percent compared to 19 percent last year.

The study also found US consumers are not aware of the US Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) and are extremely concerned about product safety.

Despite the government’s efforts to educate consumers about FSMA, Deloitte found about seven out of 10 consumers, or 68 percent of those surveyed, were unfamiliar with the new law. FSMA is considered the first major overhaul of the nation’s food safety system since the Great Depression. Respondents are also concerned about the “healthiness” of ingredients in their food products. More than half of those polled stated that this was their primary concern. Deloitte says this was an increase of 5 percentage points compared to the prior survey.

The Deloitte survey also found safety is the prime concern for household products — such as cleaners and detergents –as well as personal care products, including cosmetics and moisturizers.

The survey was commissioned by Deloitte and conducted online by an independent research company between March 1 – 3, 2011. The survey polled 1,050 consumers and has a 3 percent margin of error.

You can always find out the latest information on US Recall News. Each type of recall can be found in a separate category and has its own RSS feed. You can also stay abreast of breaking news by subscribing to our email alerts, following us on Twitter, or liking us on Facebook.

Image by Ali Karimian, used under its Creative Commons license.

Feds sting Amish farmer selling raw milk locally – Washington Times

Feds sting Amish farmer selling raw milk locally – Washington Times.

Feds sting Amish farmer selling raw milk locally

Cite interstate commerce violation

Bloomberg News</p>
<p>The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) headquarters stand in Silver Spring, Maryland. ” width=”414″ height=”142″ /></p>
<p><span class=Bloomberg News The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) headquarters stand in  Silver Spring, Maryland.

A yearlong sting operation, including aliases, a 5 a.m. surprise inspection and surreptitious purchases from an Amish farm in Pennsylvania, culminated in the federal government announcing this week that it has gone to court to stop Rainbow Acres Farm from selling its contraband to willing customers in the Washington area.

The product in question: unpasteurized milk.

It’s a battle that’s been going on behind the scenes for years, with natural foods advocates arguing that raw milk, as it’s also known, is healthier than the pasteurized product, while the Food and Drug Administration says raw milk can carry harmful bacteria such as salmonella, E. coli and listeria.

“It is the FDA’s position that raw milk should never be consumed,” said Tamara N. Ward, spokeswoman for the FDA, whose investigators have been looking into Rainbow Acres for months, and who finally last week filed a 10-page complaint in federal court in Pennsylvania seeking an order to stop the farm from shipping across state lines any more raw milk or dairy products made from it.

The farm’s owner, Dan Allgyer, didn’t respond to a message seeking comment, but his customers in the District of Columbia and Maryland were furious at what they said was government overreach.

“I look at this as the FDA is in cahoots with the large milk producers,” said Karin Edgett, a D.C. resident who buys directly from Rainbow Acres. “I don’t want the FDA and my tax dollars to go to shut down a farm that hasn’t had any complaints against it. They’re producing good food, and the consumers are extremely happy with it.” (Read more)

Danielle Nierenberg: A “Revolution of Greens” Needed to Curb Food Price Crisis

Danielle Nierenberg: A “Revolution of Greens” Needed to Curb Food Price Crisis.

Danielle Nierenberg

Danielle Nierenberg

GET UPDATES FROM Danielle Nierenberg

Food prices have soared to record highs and are projected to increase further in the coming decade, pushing millions of people into hunger — and fueling political unrest around the world.

But diversifying food production to include local and indigenous vegetables can help communities boost their self-sufficiency and protect vulnerable populations from price shocks.

Abdou Tenkouano, director of AVRDC– The World Vegetable Center’s Regional Center for Africa in Tanzania, highlights important policy recommendations in his chapter, “The Nutritional and Economic Potential of Vegetables,” in the recently published State of the World 2011: Innovations that Nourish the Planet. The accompanying policy brief is available here.

Vegetables can offer a sustainable solution for a diverse and balanced diet. Growing vegetables can help address the “hidden hunger” of micronutrient deficiencies that affects some 1 billion people worldwide, and also brings multiple benefits for farmers. “Vegetables have shorter cycles, are faster-growing than cereal crops, and require little space,” says Tenkouano.

Here are three recommendations to boost worldwide interest in and availability of indigenous vegetable varieties:

Listen to farmers. Organizations like AVRDC and the International Development Research Centre hold periodic workshops and field days, bringing together farmers, consumers, businesses, and communities to identify varieties of onion, tomato, eggplant, and okra that grow the best, taste the best, and perform best at local markets. This helps researchers develop more nutritious and locally adapted varieties that enhance and complement specific food preparations.

Get seeds to farmers. The seeds of preferred vegetable varieties are being made more widely available in Africa and elsewhere. Better seeds mean more vitamins in the food, better-tasting food, and ultimately less hunger and malnutrition. After scientists at AVRDC developed two higher-yielding tomato varieties with thicker skins — making them less vulnerable to pests and damage — farmers growing these varieties raised their incomes by 40 percent.

Take advantage of what’s local. As the impacts of climate change become more evident, indigenous vegetables that have been neglected for decades are regaining attention because of their tolerance to drought and resistance to pests. Researchers have developed improved varieties of amaranth, African eggplant, African nightshade, and cowpea that are now widely available in many parts of Africa. In Uganda, Project DISC (Developing Innovations in School Cultivation), supported by Slow Food International, is reigniting an interest in these foods by teaching students how to grow and cook indigenous vegetables.

Investing in agricultural development, especially indigenous vegetable crops, could help feed communities in Africa and worldwide, boosting their resilience to price shocks while helping farmers protect biodiversity and mitigate the impacts of climate change.

Crossposted from the Worldwatch Institute’s Nourishing the Planet.

To learn more about how AVRDC is working with farmers to diversify food production, see: Breeding Vegetables with Farmers in Mind, The Nutritional and Economic Potential of Vegetables, Listening to Farmers, Cultivating food security in Africa, Transforming Vegetables into Products, NtP in Tanzania’s The Citizen, and Innovation of the Week: Homegrown Solutions to Alleviating Hunger and Poverty.

Connect with Nourishing the Planet on Facebook.

NVIC Vaccine News

NVIC Vaccine News.

No Pharma Liability? No Vaccine Mandates.

immunization

by Barbara Loe Fisher

On February 22, 2011 the U.S. Supreme Court shielded drug companies from all liability for harm caused by vaccines mandated by government when companies could have made a safer vaccine.  1

From now on, drug companies selling vaccines in America will not be held accountable by a jury of our peers in a court of law if those vaccines brain damage us but could have been made less toxic. 2

If you get paralyzed by a flu shot or your child has a serious reaction to a vaccine required for school and becomes learning disabled, epileptic, autistic, asthmatic, diabetic or mentally retarded, you are on your own.

From now on – unless we stand up and draw the line on vaccine mandates – the government can legally use police powers to force every American to get hundreds of vaccinations or be punished while those, who are hurt by vaccination, can be more easily swept under the rug and left to fend for themselves.

Big Pharma Blackmailed Congress in 1982

To understand how this happened, we have to turn the clock back to 1982. That is when four big drug companies (Merck, Wyeth, Lederle, Connaught) blackmailed Congress by threatening to stop selling vaccines in America unless a law was passed giving them complete immunity from prosecution. 21

The pharmaceutical industry knew they were in big trouble because the old, crude whooping cough vaccine in the DPT shot was causing brain inflammation and death in many children; 22 the live oral polio vaccine was crippling children and adults with vaccine strain polio; 23  and Americans were filing lawsuits to hold drug companies responsible for the safety of their products.  (Read more)

Salmonella outbreak linked to microbiology labs – Health – Infectious diseases – msnbc.com

Salmonella outbreak linked to microbiology labs – Health – Infectious diseases – msnbc.com.

Some 73 people in 35 states have been sickened by the bacteria since August,  including some by a strain of Salmonella Typhimurium sold commercially for use in laboratory settings, the CentersforDiseaseControlandPrevention said Thursday.

The ill include students and employees of the laboratories, as well as children who live in households of people who study or work at the labs. CDC officials warned that bacteria used in the labs can be transmitted through contaminated lab coats, pens, notebooks, car keys and other items brought into the labs.

Illnesses likely began last Aug. 20, with most recent illnesses reported March 8, the CDC report said. Ill patients ranged in age from less than 1 to 91, with a median age of 24. Cases that developed after March 19 may not yet be included in the total because of the lag time in assessing and reporting illness.

CDC officials were not immediately available to discuss the death or hospitalizations associated with the outbreak. Salmonella infections typically result in diarrhea, fever and abdominal cramps. They can be dangerous in very young children or people with compromised immune systems.

Illnesses have been tied to laboratories from Alaska to New York, with most reporting one or two cases. Five cases have been reported in Washington state and four in Minnesota. (READ FULL ARTICLE)

Study Finds Antibiotic-Resistant Staph in U.S. Food Supply

Study Finds Antibiotic-Resistant Staph in U.S. Food Supply.

Study Finds Antibiotic-Resistant Staph in U.S. Food Supply

April 27, 2011

The ongoing debate regarding antibiotics use with animals destined for the table has centered on whether drug-resistant organisms created on farms travel from the farm to humans. According to a newly published study (PDF), they do.

Researchers from the Center of Food Microbiology and Environmental Health at the Translational Genomics Research Institute in Flagstaff, Arizona, found one in four packages of meat and poultry purchased contained multi-drug resistant staph.

This is the first such study of drug-resistant staph in the U.S. food supply. The researchers say it remains unknown whether humans can be infected from raw meat.

Meat producers reportedly provide healthy animals with low doses of antibiotics for several reasons. The two leading rationales are to promote young animals’ growth and to reduce the spread of infections in factory farm operations.

The researchers purchased packaged meats — 136 packages of ground beef, chicken breasts and thighs, pork chops and ground pork, and ground turkey — in five U.S. cities. Of the meat samples tested, 47 percent were contaminated with Staphylococccus aureus. Of those, more than half were resistant to three or more antibiotics.

Representatives from the turkey and pork producers contend their products are safe. “Staphylococcus aureus is a very common bacteria found in the environment, and is one of the most common found on human hands. It rarely causes any health problems,” says Hilary Thesmar, director of scientific and regulatory affairs for the National Turkey Federation in Washington, D.C., in a statement reprinted by WebMD.

“Contamination by human hands is a likely source of contamination of the products in this study,” Thesmar says. “The most important message for consumers is to follow proper food safety methods, such as washing your hands and cooking meat and poultry thoroughly. Following good food safety practices will ensure that consumers continue to enjoy safe, high-quality, and nutritious turkey products.”

Even so, there is no conclusive data showing these measures will curb or prevent the spread of staph. These forms of staph live on the skin and can continue to live there without causing illness for an unpredictable amount of time. The risk of contamination has not been studied.

Antibiotic resistance’s cost to medicine in the US has exceeded the billion dollar mark, according to The Los Angeles Times. Among the most egregious contributors to this is the predominance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which is a dangerous antibiotic-resistant infectious disease.

Although there is a system in place in the U.S. that looks for antibiotic-resistant bacteria, it does not look for MRSA. Even so, testing food for MRSA would not have found the various multi-drug resistant strains revealed in this latest study because they were not MRSA.

This newest work supports previous research from The Netherlands that found live poultry and meat carried identical, highly drug-resistant E. coli. This led them to conclude that antibiotic resistance seems to be moving from poultry raised with antibiotics to humans via food. The study specifically looked at extended-spectrum beta-lactamase resistance (ESBL).

The Los Angeles Times notes that antibiotic resistance has long been a problem. In 1969, a British government study recommended banning antibiotics. “The first observation that giving antibiotics to animals spreads antibiotic-resistant bacteria to humans was made in 1976, and there has been a steady accumulation of evidence since,” wrote Maryn McKenna, author of Superbug and Beating Back the Devil, in a March Wired article.

Organizations including World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Medical Association, and others support restricting antibiotic use, including for treating humans. This new study was partially funded by the Pew Charitable Trusts, which also studied the issue in its Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production.

“For more than 50 years microbiologists have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animals. The practice, they argue, threatens human health by turning farms into breeding grounds of drug-resistant bacteria,” wrote Scientific American’s editors in a March 30, 2011, editorial.

“Although even the proper use of antibiotics can inadvertently lead to the spread of drug-resistant bacteria, the habit of using a low or subtherapeutic dose is a formula for disaster: the treatment provides just enough antibiotic to kill some but not all bacteria. …  The data from multiple studies over the years support the conclusion that low doses of antibiotics in animals increase the number of drug-resistant microbes in both animals and people. …Stronger measures to deprive drug-resistant bacteria of their agricultural breeding grounds simply make scientific, economic and common sense.” (Article Link)

By Linda Dailey Paulson

Image by nate steiner, used under its Creative Commons license.

Pesticides Are Good For You! Propaganda From Big Ag Alliance | Health Freedom Alliance

Pesticides Are Good For You! Propaganda From Big Ag Alliance | Health Freedom Alliance.

Pesticides Are Good For You! Propaganda From Big Ag Alliance

Submitted by Lois Rain on April 25, 2011 – 4:08 pm7 Comments
97Share

Rachel Carson is turning in her grave… Who knew that all her sacrifice and diligent research involving the deadly effects of pesticides on nature would be brushed away by an article from croplife.org that pesticides are actually good for you! Forget Carson’s “Silent Spring,” because not only are pesticides harmless, they actually provide health benefits to the environment, animals, and humans…?

It’s so inconceivable that you have read it to believe it. It goes into the numerous benefits of pesticides’ “carefully regulated” application. But hey, the FDA says it’s safe, so…

Likewise, the Alliance to Feed the Future seeks to counter negative attitudes towards pesticide use and other Big Ag practices. Their members were in support of the recent phony food safety bill. They are  currently developing national production standards which are swiped from Codex guidelines, among other such groups. Expect to hear the buzzword “sustainable” more in the near future as they attempt to actually drag food production standards in the ditch while seeking to deregulate Big Ag practices for quicker corporate profits.

Remember, “Just because the bees are dying off along with small game and some not so small game, and just because you have some kind of untreatable rash covering your body that no one can find a cure for, never forget the issue is not your health or the environment…  Its all about convenience and affordability! ”

(Read more)

~Health Freedoms

Tornadoes damage reactors in U.S.; Backups work – CBS News

Tornadoes damage reactors in U.S.; Backups work – CBS News.

April 28, 2011

Tornadoes damage reactors in U.S.; Backups work

Amid questions about nuclear safety following Japanese disaster, destruction from Southern storms provides an early test

  • This photograph taken March 12, 2008, shows TVA's Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant near Athens, Ala.This photograph taken March 12, 2008, shows TVA’s Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant near Athens, Ala.  (Browns Ferry nuclear plant)
(CBS/AP)Alabama and other southern states are reeling from a series of tornadoes that killed more than 200 people. But there’s no nuclear disaster to go with the natural disaster — a promising sign amid concerns that the U.S. could someday face a nuclear crisis like the one that has followed the earthquake and tsunami in Japan.

The savage storms in that passed through parts of Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee and Virginia on Wednesday knocked out power to the Browns Ferry nuclear power plant, about 30 miles west of Huntsville, Ala.

The Tennessee Valley Authority-owned plant had to use seven diesel generators to power the plant’s three units. The safety systems operated as needed and the emergency event was classified as the lowest of four levels, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission said.

All three units at TVA’s 3,274-megawatt plant shut down around 5:30 p.m. Wednesday. External power was restored quickly to the plant but diesel generators remained running Wednesday evening, Reuters reports, citing a Nuclear Regulatory Commission spokeswoman.

“The Browns Ferry units are among 23 U.S. reactors that are similar in design to the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in Japan where backup generators were swept away in the tsunami that followed the massive earthquake on March 11,” Reuters reported.

Severe though the natural disaster was, it hardly matched the destruction — in property and lives — of the March 11 quake and tsunami in northern Japan, which is thought to have killed more than 20,000 people and caused at least partial meltdowns at several of the Fukushima reactors.

That event brought renewed attention to nuclear safety in the U.S., where many plants rely on the same model of reactors found at the Fukushima plant. Experts say that lax regulation and the possibility of earthquakes and other natural disasters put U.S. plants at risk.

Much of the attention has focused not on the earthquake-prone West Coast, but major nuclear plants in the East, including the Indian Point plant north of New York City, which the NRC found most at risk for catastrophic damage from an earthquake.

Nuclear reactor nightmare: Could it happen in the U.S.?
U.S. nuclear plants pose same risks as Japan’s
What’s the most at-risk U.S. nuclear power plant?

Browns Ferry output had been reduced earlier in Wednesday due to transmission line damage from the storms, Reuters reports. It does not appear that the plant suffered a direct hit.

Crews were working to make repairs, but the severe weather was forecast to continue, the Tennessee Valley Authority said in a release.


© 2011 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Recalls, Market Withdrawals, & Safety Alerts Jonathans Sprouts Recalls Alfalfa Sprouts Because of Possible Health Risk Extends Recall of 4/19/11 to Additional Products and Codes )

Recalls, Market Withdrawals, & Safety Alerts Jonathans Sprouts Recalls Alfalfa Sprouts Because of Possible Health Risk Extends Recall of 4/19/11 to Additional Products and Codes ).

Sprout Recall

Jonathans Sprouts Recalls Alfalfa Sprouts Because of Possible Health Risk

http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm252468.htm

(Extends Recall of 4/19/11 to Additional Products and Codes)

Contact:
Liz Reilley
508-763-2577

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – April 22, 2011 – Jonathans Sprouts of Rochester, MA is upgrading its recall of conventional alfalfa sprout products with a specific sell-by date to include all of its alfalfa products, conventional and organic, with all sell-by dates, as a precaution, because it has the potential to be contaminated with Salmonella, an organism which can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems. Healthy persons infected with Salmonella often experience fever, diarrhea (which may be bloody), nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. In rare circumstances, infection with Salmonella can result in the organism getting into the bloodstream and producing more severe illnesses such as arterial infections (i.e., infected aneurysms), endocarditis and arthritis.

Six products are involved:

* Jonathan’s 4oz Alfalfa Sprouts – all sell-by dates
* Jonathan’s 4oz Organic Alfalfa Sprouts – all sell-by dates
* Jonathan’s 4oz Alfalfa with Radish Sprouts – all sell-by dates
* Jonathan’s 4oz Organic Alfalfa with Radish Sprouts – all sell-by dates
* Jonathan’s 4oz Gourmet Sprouts – all sell-by dates
* Jonathan’s 4oz Alfalfa with Dill Sprouts – all sell-by dates
* Jonathan’s 8oz Alfalfa Sprouts – all sell-by dates
* Jonathan’s Organic Sprout Salad – all sell by dates

The product is sold in plastic containers, approximately 4 inches cube. See attached photographs.

They are sold at the following stores:

A&P, Grand Union, Stop & Shop, Shaws, Hannaford, Donnelans, Foodmaster, Truccis, Roche Brothers

The product listed below is distributed in bulk to food service establishments (restaurants, etc)

* Jonathan’s 5lb Bulk Alfalfa in waxed 18”x11” cardboard cartons -  all codes
* Jonathan’s 5lb Bulk Organic Alfalfa Sprouts in waxed 18” x 11” cardboard cartons -  all codes
* Jonathan’s 4lb Bulk Alfalfa Sprouts in bags 2lb bags in a 13”x9”x6” cardboard carton – all codes

The products containing alfalfa sprouts were distributed in Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, Maryland, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware.

The product being recalled was identified through routine sampling as part of the USDA Microbiological Data Program.

Consumers who have purchased Jonathans Sprouts products containing alfalfa sprouts are urged to return it to the place of purchase for a full refund. Consumers with questions may contact the company at 508-763-2577.

###

« Older entries

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 62 other followers