Vegetarian Beans With Rice

Vegetarian Beans With Rice

Serve this vegetarian entree with salad and tortillas.

Beans:
2 C. pinto beans
1/2 medium onion, chopped
2 bay leaves
8 C. cold water
Very small amount of salt (optional)
1 t. vegetable oil
3 cloves garlic, chopped  Rice:
1 small onion, chopped
2 medium tomatoes, peeled and seeded
2 cloves garlic
2 C. long-grain white rice
1 t. vegetable oil
4 C. low-sodium chicken broth (remove fat)
very small amount of salt (optional)
1 C. fresh or frozen peas
1 T. chopped fresh cilantro

To make beans

1.   Pick over beans to remove any stones and wash. Soak beans overnight.
2.   Put beans into large pot with onion, bay leaves and water.
3.   Bring water to simmer and cook beans until tender, 1 1/2 to 3 hours.
4.   Add water as needed as beans cook. Season to taste with salt (optional) and cook until very soft.
5.   Remove from heat and discard bay leaves.
6.    Strain off remaining liquid and set aside.
7.    In medium, nonstick skillet, warm oil over medium heat.
8.    Add garlic and cook until fragrant, about 1 minute.
9.    Add 1/2 C. cooked beans to skillet and mash with back of wooden spoon.
10.  Gradually stir in liquid from bean pot and cook until paste is quite thick.
11.   Stir mashed bean mixture back into pot of beans and simmer together for 4 to 5 minutes.
12.  To make rice:

In food processor or blender, puree onion, tomatoes and garlic.
 
In medium, nonstick saucepan, warm oil over medium heat.

Add rice and stir until light golden.

Stir in vegetable puree and cook until all moisture has been absorbed.

Stir in chicken broth and season lightly with salt (optional). If you are using fresh peas stir them in, too.

Bring rice to simmer, reduce heat to very low, and cover pan.

Cook until rice is tender and chicken broth is absorbed, about 20 minutes.

If you are using frozen peas, stir them in at last minute.

Sprinkle cilantro over top of rice and serve.

——————————————————————————–

YIELD: 8 servings SERVING SIZE: 3/4 cup beans; 1 cup rice

NUTRITION ANALYSIS PER SERVING: Calories, 404; Fat, 3 grams; Saturated
fat, 0 grams; Cholesterol, 0 milligrams; Sodium, 42 milligrams*;
Dietary fiber, 6 grams; Carbohydrates, 78 grams; Protein, 17 grams

*Sodium content does not include addition of optional amounts of salt mentioned in recipe.

From Healthy Hispanic Recipes by the National Cancer Institute.

Deep-Fried and Divided

Deep-Fried and Divided
Conference chews over how food has shaped racial relations and identity in the South
KATHLEEN PURVIS
Food Editor

OXFORD, Miss. – Growing up in Chicago, Audrey Petty played air guitar
and sang along to white-bread rock like "Bohemian Rhapsody."

Her best friend was white and Jewish.

And she ate chitlins only to please her mother.

"Chitlins were straight-up country — k-u-n-t-r-e-e. If you called someone `country,’ you were calling them out."

The thoroughly assimilated daughter of Southern black parents, Petty
grew up to be an assistant professor of English at the University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. And she came to Mississippi this month to
deliver a lecture, "The Sacred and Profane: Late-Night Chitlins With
Momma."

Chew over. Swallow. Digest.

Is it a coincidence they are all words that can describe both eating and discussing?

The fifth annual Southern Foodways Symposium convened on the campus of
the University of Mississippi Oct. 7-10 to chew over, swallow and try
to digest the meaning of Southern food.

After years of lectures that danced delicately around loaded issues of
race in Southern food, this time the theme was squarely on the table:
"Southern Food in Black and White."

Food and tension

The symposium, organized by a group of writers, historians and
interested eaters who call themselves the Southern Foodways Alliance,
has always aimed at finding the common ground under the plate.The
organizer and driving force is food writer John T. Edge of Ole Miss’
Center for the Study of Southern Culture. Edge’s genius has come not
only from organizing an academic gathering that lures people of diverse
backgrounds to talk about controversial subjects.

It’s also in the way he has gone about it, giving lectures and events
absurd names. This year’s conference included "The Fried Chicken Throw
Down" and "Possum & Taters: Where Have You Gone?"

The names are slightly silly, easing the discomfort of the subjects
they disguise: symbolic foods that are fraught with tension and the
contested ownership of traditions.

In that context, watermelon, fried chicken and chitlins aren’t just
foods. They’re symbols of the way we have defined ourselves and others,
and the terrible gulf in between.

In America, a land of "familiar strangers," we get mixed messages, said
Adrian Miller, this year’s program chair. A special assistant to
President Clinton who helped organize the White House’s Initiative for
One America in the 1990s, Miller pointed out the difficulty: We’re
taught to look past racial differences at the same time we’re taught to
respect heritage.

That makes it hard to talk, he said.

"We don’t have shared memories of history."

`Still talking about race’

Will D. Campbell, the civil-rights and anti-war activist and preacher,
started the conference with his own memory of history. A white
Mississippi native, he was literally driven out with his family 48
years ago, escorted to the Tennessee border by state troopers.

Some things never change, he said. "We are still `Ole Miss,’ and we are still talking about race."

York County, S.C., peach farmer and author Dori Sanders followed,
taking the lectern to describe growing up on a black-owned farm. "It
wasn’t always so wonderful," she said. After the Civil War and well
into the 20th century, most black farmers were reduced to sharecropping.

"The S stood for `slavery’ and the C stood for `continued,’ " she said. "It was slavery continued."

And Diane McWhorter, the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of "Carry Me
Home," about growing up white in segregated Birmingham, Ala., described
Southern civility as "the balm" that allowed whites to live with
segregation.

Along with several other speakers, McWhorter noted one of segregation’s greatest ironies:

Black servants could cook and handle white people’s food, but they
weren’t allowed to use the same water fountain or bathroom or share
that food at the same table.

After leaving the South, McWhorter found she identified more with blacks than with her Northern neighbors.

"Southern culture is black culture, in a way."

African influence

The discussions continued for three days, chewing over issues like
"toting privileges," which allowed black cooks to take leftovers home
to their families, and the relationships between domestic servants and
their employers. White employers called servants "like a member of the
family" but never gave them holidays and Sundays off to be with their
own families."I learned to cook at 11 years old," said Dr. Trudier
Harris of UNC Chapel Hill. Her own mother was a domestic who had to
leave early to cook breakfast for white families.

But as the lectures continued, through brief histories of watermelon
rind pickles and descriptions of presidents who loved ‘possum and sweet
potatoes, an interesting pattern emerged.

People talked about food. And they talked about race. But they never really talked about food and race.

The closest moment came in an informal meeting on the porch of Taylor
Grocery, a catfish restaurant near Oxford, when Guelel Sanghott, a
musician from Senegal who has lived in Mississippi for a year, took a
break from playing for the crowd.

Since Senegal is in West Africa, the origin of most of the slaves who
were brought to America, Sanghott was asked if Southern food seemed
familiar.

Oh yes, he answered enthusiastically. Jambalaya, okra, rice. They are
all food from home. He described a fish stew made with rice and "tomato
pasta" (tomato paste).

Skip the fish and it would be a close cousin to Charleston’s red rice.

Stripping the myths

Unlike past years, when the symposium brought emotional debate over
points of history like the origin of fried chicken, this year’s
symposium was almost pointedly polite. A New York Times article the day
before it opened had predicted fireworks that did not come to pass.

But maybe the reason the Southern Foodways Symposium didn’t cover race
and food is for the same reason that discussions stayed so respectful:

Maybe Americans are finally reaching a point where differences are less
important than similarities, where ownership of tradition is less
important than keeping tradition alive.

"This is a process, not a product," said cookbook author Ronni Lundy, a
founding member of the alliance. "We keep coming back to the table to
strip away the embroidery," to free Southern food of its myths, both
romanticized and demonized.

If the differences are disappearing, what we are left with is respect
and the right to own our own experiences without denying someone else
the right to own them, too.

Maybe the end of conversation is the beginning of understanding.

TALKING POINTS

Program committee chair Adrian Miller is the director of outreach for
the Bell Policy Center in Colorado and a former special assistant to
President Clinton. He offered a list of community activities to foster
discussions of food and race. He also requested that anyone who tries
them report the results by e-mailing sfamail@olemiss.edu.

• Dinner club. Host a dinner with diverse guests and feature Southern
food items. Discuss how many people in the South eat the same things.

• Book club. Read a Southern cookbook and a soul food cookbook. Compare the similarities and differences.

• Gardening. Start a community garden and share the harvest.

• Faith community. Have a joint worship service with another faith institution. Conclude with a pot-luck supper.

• Oral history. Identify the great cooks, black and white, in your community. Interview them together.

• Chefs. Do a "chef exchange" between white and black chefs at Southern restaurants.
——————————————————————————–

© 2004 Charlotte Observer and wire service sources. All Rights Reserved.
http://www.charlotte.com

Banning GM Crops Not Enough to Save wildlife

 Banning GM crops not enough to save wildlife
 19:00 15 October 03
 
Exclusive from New Scientist Print Edition. Subscribe and get 4 free issues.
 
Genetically modified crops are now grown in more than 16 countries. In
2002, farmers around the world planted 60 million hectares of land with
dozens of varieties of GM crops. Yet in the UK, the decision to approve
or reject the technology could hinge on the results, out on Thursday,
of four-year trials involving 280 fields of three GM crops.

Although these farm-scale evaluations are being portrayed as a test of
the environmental credentials of GM crops, it is really the weedkillers
to which they are resistant that are on trial.

The studies looked only at the effect that these herbicides had on
"wildlife" in fields, in the form of weeds and insects. But if the aim
of the exercise really is to save farmland wildlife, banning any of the
GM crops tested is unlikely to make much difference.

   
 Non-GM herbicide-resistant plants
That is because herbicide use in the UK is soaring even before any GM
crops are introduced. And in the long term, farmers denied GM crops may
instead turn to non-GM crops bred to be resistant to herbicides. That
might seem like a good thing to those who oppose GM technology, but
like GM crops, the conventionally bred strains allow farmers to splash
on the herbicide.

Their impact on farmland wildlife in Europe could be worse than that of
the weedkiller-resistant GM crops, because many allow the use of more
noxious herbicides than GM strains. And as with GM crops, the
herbicide-resistance could spread to other crops and wild relatives.

Desired trait

Despite this, these crops do not have to undergo the same scrutiny as
GM crops because they are not genetically engineered. The only hurdle
they face in the UK is tests designed to confirm that they are indeed
new varieties. And while GM crops can be banned under world trade rules
on the grounds that they pose a threat to human health or the
environment, the same is not true of conventional herbicide-resistant
crops.

"We’re as concerned about them as GM crops," says Brian Johnson, an
adviser on GM technology to the conservation group English Nature. "The
same principles should be applied to all crops, irrespective of their
origin." The sequencing of plant genomes is making it much easier for
breeders to create non-GM plants with a desired trait, he points out.

None of these crops is yet grown in the UK, unless one counts maize,
which is naturally resistant to the herbicide atrazine. But one company
has already tried to market them. An application to sell
imidazolinone-resistant rapeseed in the UK was turned down in 1998 only
because the strain proved low-yielding when trialled (New Scientist
print edition, 27 February 1999).

This strain and others like it are already grown in several countries.
More are being developed. And companies are likely to redouble their
efforts if GM herbicide-resistant crops are banned in Europe. "We’re
continually looking at GM and non-GM solutions. If the market is there,
we’d explore all avenues," a Syngenta spokesman told New Scientist.

"We would be foolish to turn our backs on the possibility that other
methods of plant breeding could generate the same results without the
transgenic approach," says a Monsanto spokesman. "The regulatory
systems effectively ignore all these other methods, and are driven by
politics, not science. As things stand, a non-GM plant would bypass the
arguments against GM."

Rapid breakdown

But so far Monsanto has been unable to create conventional crops
resistant to glyphosate, the herbicide it sells as Roundup. Glyphosate
is regarded as one of the most benign herbicides because it breaks down
relatively rapidly. That is not true of many of the herbicides to which
companies have been able to breed resistant crops.

For instance, almost all Australia’s oilseed rape now consists of
strains bred to be resistant to broad-spectrum herbicides. The most
popular, accounting for 72 per cent of the total grown, is "TT canola",
which tolerates the triazine herbicides, including atrazine, an older
herbicide suspected of poisoning frogs and polluting rivers.

The original strains were created by researchers at the University of
Guelph in Ontario, Canada, who cross-bred commercial canolas with a
weedy relative, Brassica rapa, which had evolved resistance to
triazines.

Another variety, "Clearfield" rapeseed, is resistant to the
imidazolinone family of weedkillers. Scientists made it by chemically
mutating rapeseed strains until they produced some strains resistant to
the herbicide.

Both strains were approved without the fuss surrounding GM crops,
despite arguments that imidazolinones and atrazine are worse for the
environment than the herbicides such as glyphosate. "The two canolas
that were classically bred have greater problems with persistence of
herbicides and resistance than the GM ones do," says Rick Roush, now of
the University of California at Davis, who served for five years with
Australia’s GM regulation body, the Office of the Gene Technology
Regulator.

"Atrazine is probably the most problematic of these two herbicides, as
it is mobile in water and frequently appears in groundwater and
waterways," says Chris Preston of the University of Adelaide. "Atrazine
is persistent and in dry years may cause minor damage to subsequent
wheat crops."

Rising use

Imidazolinones, meanwhile, can last so long in soil that it is
impossible to grow a crop the following season. "Australians opposed to
GM crops have totally ignored the fact that most of our canola is
already herbicide tolerant, and have also ignored problems with
currently used herbicides," says Preston.

In the UK the use of atrazine has increased from 34,000 kilograms a
year in 1992 to over 130,000 kg in 2002, mostly because more naturally
resistant maize and sweetcorn is being grown. Atrazine was one of the
"conventional" treatments against which GM glyphosate-resistant maize
was evaluated in the UK’s farm-scale trials.

Critics say that glyphosate-resistant GM maize is bound to look good
compared with atrazine, and that the comparison is irrelevant because
of an impending European ban. But the UK has applied for an exemption
from the ban for sweetcorn.

The EU ban does mean that TT Canola is unlikely to be grown in Europe.
But Clearfield products are edging closer, with launch this year of
imidazolinone-resistant sunflowers in Turkey, and the development of
similar varieties for southern and eastern Europe. BASF, the company
that makes Clearfield strains, has just launched
imidazolinone-resistant wheat in Australia and may develop variants for
the European market.

Even without herbicide-resistant crops, GM or otherwise, herbicide use
has soared in the UK, with glyphosate use more than quadrupling in a
decade (see graph). The biggest rise has been on farms, where farmers
receive subsidies to reduce overproduction by temporarily leaving
fields fallow, but keep these "set aside" fields free of weeds with
glyphosate. Glyphosate use has also soared on cereals such as wheat and
barley, to compensate for a side effect of a popular fungicide.

"There’s no strategic control over technologies used in the
countryside," says Johnson. "We have many well-meaning technologies,
but not a means to regulate them."
  
Andy Coghlan
 
 © Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.
 
 

Recipe: Lemon-Oregano Grouper with Vegetables




Lemon-Oregano White Fish with Vegetables

Any white fish, perch, sea bass, blue whiting, orange roughfy, will work in this recipe.

When you use the French technique of oven-steaming single servings of fish, seasonings,
and vegetables in individual packages, the reward is twofold: very little to clean up and lots
of flavor. Any white fish, like perch, sea bass, blue whiting, orange roughfy, will work in this recipe.






Whole-wheat couscous makes a quick side dish for this fish; prepare it while the fish is cooking.





2 tablespoons olive oil, divided



2 small zucchini, julienned



1 cup fresh or frozen corn kernels



1/4 cup diced red pepper



1/2 teaspoon coarse salt





4 (5-ounce) grouper fillets, about 1 inch thick



Coarse salt and freshly ground black pepper to taste



2 teaspoons fresh lemon juice
2 tablespoons fresh oregano, coarsely chopped



4 paper-thin slices lemon, halved

Preheat the oven to 375F.





Combine 1 tablespoon olive oil and the next four ingredients.





Divide this vegetable mixture among
four large pieces of aluminum foil, placing the vegetables in the center of each piece.





Sprinkle each
grouper fillet with salt and pepper and place the fish on top of the vegetables.






Combine the remaining tablespoon of olive oil, lemon juice, and oregano.





Drizzle one-quarter of this
mixture over each grouper fillet and top with 2 lemon-slice halves.





Seal the package by rolling up

the top and sides and bake at 375F for 16-20 minutes or until the fish flakes easily with a fork.





Place each foil package on a serving plate, open the package, and serve.

——————————————————————————–




Yield: 4 servings; Serving: 1 grouper fillet with vegetables
Calories: 239; Protein: 30.4 g; Carbohydrate: 10 g; Fiber: 1.8 g; Sodium: 318 mg;
Fat 9 g (Sat: 1.36 g, Mono: 5.41 g, Poly: 1.34 g, Trans: 0.07 g); Cholesterol: 52 mg

General: One serving of this fish provides 50 percent of the requirement for vitamin C and a good
laundry list of different minerals, including magnesium, iron, zinc, and phosphorus.






Diabetic: For carbohydrate counters, 10 grams. Equals 4 very lean meat exchanges, 2 vegetables,
and 1 fat.

Sodium-Restricted: The bulk of the sodium comes from the salt added to vegetables. Omit the
added salt and sodium will be reduced to under 20 milligrams.






Pregnant: No special considerations.




———————————————————————————–



From EAT, DRINK AND BE HEALTHY by Walter C. Willett, M.D. Copyright © 2001 by the
President and Fellows of Harvard College. Reprinted by permission of Simon & Schuster, Inc.

Black Colleges Join Battle of the Bulge

MSNBC.com Black colleges join battle of the bulge Schools roll out the
veggies, trying to change habits of the next generation The Associated
Press Updated: 4:43 p.m. ET

Oct. 23, 2005 NORFOLK, Va. – As students talk over the thump of rapper
Chingy’s “Right Thurr,” Tina Carroll stands in a corner of the
university dining hall deliberating. Piled in front of her are sliced
carrots, peas and steaming squash chunks. Nearby, breaded chicken
patties fan out like meaty playing cards, and french fries glisten in
fat-laden glory.

Carroll nibbles her manicured fingernails, her eyes darting between
each selection. At 187 pounds — well above what’s recommended for her
5-foot-2 frame — the 22-year-old graduate student knows decisions she
makes here could mean the difference between the bootylicious body of
her dreams or a lifetime of weight gain. Nationwide, health experts
agree the obesity epidemic is striking hardest among Hispanics and
Blacks, with waistlines — and rates of diabetes, high blood pressure
and stroke — expanding at alarming rates. Predominantly black colleges
like Norfolk State University are stepping in, rolling out veggie-heavy
menus, building walking trails and even launching campus-wide weight
loss contests.

Their aim: to curb the ballooning of Black America by targeting the
next generation. “Our students are at a prime time in their lives where
they can make choices that can prevent them from having these
problems,” said Cynthia Burwell, head of Norfolk State’s internship
programs and an organizer of the health effort. Similar weight-loss
initiatives have been started at five other historically Black
colleges: Talladega College in Alabama, Alcorn State University in
Mississippi, Lincoln University in Pennsylvania, South Carolina State
University and Wiley College in Texas.

Their programs are supported through federal grants distributed by the
National Association for Equal Opportunity in Higher Education, or
NAFEO. Later, the umbrella group will turn over data on student weight
trends to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ minority
health office for review. NAFEO grew concerned last year after noticing
national obesity trends having an especially striking impact at the 120
schools it represents. “Obesity, as we all know, is an epidemic across
the country, particularly affecting minorities,” said NAFEO senior
health adviser Julia Anderson. “It’s no secret.” Estimates are that
nearly two-thirds of Americans are overweight or obese.

Blacks, especially women, are carrying many of the pounds: A study by
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found as many as 70.6
percent of black women across various age groups qualified as
overweight or obese between 1999 and 2002. ‘Many students are obese’
And while few of the participating black colleges keep hard data,
Alcorn State human sciences chairman Ross Santell said it’s easy to see
the weight problem is alive and well on Black campuses. “Many, many,
many students are obese,” said Santell, organizer of his campus’
weight-loss effort, which includes passing out pedometers. “If you look
around campus, you can see that clearly our student body is
overweight.” Officials at Wiley estimate nearly 25 percent of their
students are overweight, and at Lincoln University 90 students and
staffers have already signed up to shed pounds through their
eight-week, campus-wide fitness challenge.

 At Norfolk State, campus health experts will teach students how
to gauge their weight by calculating their body-mass index and to chart
weight loss through shrinking jean sizes rather than dreaded weigh-ins.
In dining halls, monthly theme nights highlight new kinds of fruits and
vegetables, while “PHAT stations” across campus let students check
their blood pressure and heart rates. “All connect going toward the
same outcome, which is to improve the fitness of our folks,” said
Spartan Health Center medical director John Anderson. They’re battling
more than just the lure of Burger King. Fighting tradition For one,
Anderson said they’re up against decades of cultural tradition that
emphasize pig’s feet, chitlins and other soul food staples doctors say
just aren’t healthy. Combine that with a sense of invincibility and you
get students picking fried chicken over veggie burgers, he said. Being
away from home also complicates things, said Lincoln women’s center
director Michaile Rainey. “Once you come to college, you can pretty
much pick and choose what type of food and when you want to eat it,”
she said. “You can order Domino’s at 2 a.m. because you’re studying.
That’s a contributor.” At Norfolk, Carroll can testify.

A former runner and volleyball player, the Philadelphia native
maintained a size 6 through high school. Now she’s closer to a size 14.
“When I got to college, it went from two meals a day to three meals
plus snacks,” said Carroll, who estimates that all of her six closest
friends are over their ideal weights. Now she tends to eat on the run,
avoiding the square meal and vegetarian options offered in campus
cafeterias in favor of grab-and-go sandwiches. She joined the health
challenge in hopes of dropping 30 pounds and reaching her ideal of
“thick” — that is, thin, but with the strategic curves once praised in
the Sir Mix-a-Lot rap classic “Baby Got Back.” “I’m going into PR,
where you need to have … that magazine look,” she said. But today she
chooses french fries and a fried chicken sandwich.
———————————————————————————-
© 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not
be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. © 2005 MSNBC.com
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9795429/

List Of Tips To Reduce Salt Consumption

List Of Tips To Reduce Salt Consumption
July 29, 2003

(The
Associated Press) — Some tips to reduce sodium consumption, from the
National Institutes of Health and American Public Health Association:


-Use spices instead of salt when cooking. Lemon juice, cayenne pepper and salt-free seasoning blends are alternatives.

-Eliminating
salt during cooking in favor of sprinkling a smidgen at the table can
cut sodium, as can using coarser salts that tickle the tongue more than
fine grains.


-Buy
fresh or plain frozen vegetables — those frozen with sauces add
sodium. Or choose canned versions labeled "no salt added."


-Choose
"reduced sodium" versions of convenience products when available, and
check nutrition labels to compare sodium contents of competing brands.
Cut back on frozen dinners and packaged mixes that typically contain
lots of sodium.


-Limit foods that are cured, such as bacon, or pickled, and sodium-packed condiments such as MSG, soy sauce and catsup.

-Rinsing certain canned foods, such as tuna, removes some sodium.

-Watch
for salt code words on food labels and recipes: 1 teaspoon of baking
soda equals 1,000 milligrams of sodium; MSG is a common
sodium-containing ingredient.


-In
restaurants, look for low-sodium foods on menus, and watch for terms
that indicate lots of sodium: pickled, cured, broth, soy sauce.


-When
ordering, request that your dish be prepared without salt. The National
Restaurant Association says most restaurants will try to accommodate
that request. <img
align=left>http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/of98-805/lessons/chpt6/shaker.gif</img&gt;


The
NIH advises healthy people to get no more than 2,400 milligrams of
sodium a day; 1,500 mg for those with high blood pressure.


For
sample menus and recipes for both sodium levels, check the NIH Web site
at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/public/heart/hbp/dash/new-dash.pdf
.

———————————————————————
Copyright 2003 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
 

Fatty Diet May Boost Breast Cancer Risk

Fatty Diet May Boost Breast Cancer Risk

July 18, 2003

LONDON (AP) — A new study reopens the question, long
dismissed by researchers, of whether women who eat, 
high-fat diets increase their risk of breast cancer.

The study found that those who average more than 90 grams
of fat a day have roughly double the risk of those who eat
just 37 grams.

However, the finding is likely to be controversial, since it contradicts
 many large, careful studies that found no link between what women
 eat and their risk of this common cancer.

Researchers who conducted the latest study argue theirs is better,
because it used a more precise method of measuring women’s typical
diets.   However, others said the study is too small to overturn the vast
research suggesting diet plays little or no role in breast cancer risk.

The study, published in this week’s Lancet medical journal, was
conducted at Cambridge University in England and involved 13,070
women who kept diet records from 1993-97.

The researchers set out to discover whether the reason the previous
follow-up studies found no link was that the method they used to examine
 dietary habits — a food frequency questionnaire — was too inaccurate.
 They also had the women keep a daily diary in which they recorded
everything they ate.

By 2002, 168 of the women had developed breast cancer.  Each of those
 cases was matched with four healthy women of the same age who had
filled out the questionnaires and diaries around the same time as the
women who developed breast cancer had.

The total group was divided into five equal categories of about 170,
according to how much fat they ate each day. Two methods were
used to place the women in one of the five categories; one based on
the questionnaire and one on the daily diary.

The researchers calculated separately for both methods the difference
 in breast cancer risk between the women who ate the least fat and those
who ate the most fat. "The effects just weren’t seen with food frequency
questionnaires," said investigator Sheila Bingham, deputy director of the
human nutrition unit at Cambridge University. She called the questionnaire
a "very crude method" that was not reliable.

 However, when the food diaries were used to categorize the women,
those who ate the diet highest in saturated fat were twice as likely to
develop breast cancer as those who ate the least.

Of those in the lowest category, 14 percent developed breast cancer,
compared with 20 percent, in the highest class. The more fat that was
consumed, the higher the risk of breast cancer.

Women who ate a higher-fat diet were not necessarily fatter; but once
 the researchers adjusted the results to eliminate skewing by other
factors promoting breast cancer, such body weight and total calories
eaten, the women who ate the most saturated fat had twice the breast
 cancer risk as those who ate the least.

 Most of the fat in the women’s diets was saturated fat, so the findings
 for total fat intake were similar.

Marji McCullough, an epidemiologist at the American Cancer Society,
 said researchers disagree over whether a questionnaire or food diary is
 more accurate.

Furthermore, the number of cancer cases in the latest study is small as
 such research goes. A recent analysis combined over 7,000 cancer
cases in eight studies and found no risk from fat.

"If you consider all the evidence right now, you would assume there is
 a very small or no effect of fat on breast cancer," she said. However,
Dr. Elio Riboli, a nutrition and cancer expert, said, "These results
reopen entirely the issue of the importance of investigating more, and
with better data, the saturated fat-breast cancer hypothesis."

The chance of a woman developing breast cancer sometime during her
 life is between 8 percent and 11 percent, according to the World Health
Organization. "This article is a major step in the torturous process of
identifying the dietary determinants of breast cancer," said Riboli, who
 works with the U.N.’s International Agency for Research on Cancer.
 "Doubling or reducing by 50 percent the risk would make a huge
impact on the suffering of tens of thousands of women each year."

Many early studies that looked back at the diets of breast cancer
patients and compared them with the eating habits of healthy women
of the same age found that a diet high in fat, or saturated fat — fat that
 comes from animal-based food such as meat, fish and dairy products
 – was weakly associated with a modest increase in breast cancer risk.

Experiments in lab animals also indicated that high fat intake could
increase the likelihood of breast cancer. However, most of the recent
 studies, which followed groups of healthy women over time, failed
to find a link.

———————————————————————————

Copyright 2003 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

To Your Health: Pomegranate Juice

MSNBC.com
Pomegranate juice may fight prostate cancer
Tumors in mice shrank when given fruit drink, researchers report

Reuters 
Sept. 27, 2005


WASHINGTON – Pomegranate
juice, a deep red juice becoming popular as a health drink, works
against prostate cancer cells in lab dishes and in mice, U.S.
researchers reported Tuesday.



Prostate tumors shrank in mice infected with human prostate tumors who
drank pomegranate juice, the researchers report in this week’s issue of
the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.



The juice is rich in antioxidants — chemicals that give fruits and
vegetables their deep colors and which also act against the chemicals
that damage cells, leading to cancer and other disease.



“Our study — while early — adds to growing evidence that pomegranates
contain very powerful agents against cancer, particularly prostate
cancer,” said Dr. Hasan Mukhtar, a professor of dermatology at the
University of Wisconsin Medical School, who led the study.


“There is good reason now to test this fruit in humans –both for cancer prevention and for treatment,” he said in a statement.


It is a far step from treating mice infected with human cancer to
treating people, but other studies have also suggested pomegranate
juice and other antioxidant-rich foods may help fight tumors.



Prostate cancer is the second-biggest cancer killer of men after lung
cancer, killing 30,000 this year, according to the American Cancer
Society. It will be diagnosed in more than 230,000 U.S. men, many of
whom will choose not to be treated but rather to watch a slow-growing
tumor carefully.



Copyright 2005 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or
redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the
prior written consent of Reuters.
———————————————————————————————–
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9506038/

———————————————————————————————–

© 2005 MSNBC.com



Broccoli, Beans May Lower Risk of Lung Cancer

Broccoli, Beans May Lower Risk of Lung Cancer

M.D. Anderson research indicates phytoestrogens in food block disease
By TODD ACKERMAN

Houston researchers have found that eating certain fruits and
vegetables may produce an unexpected benefit: protection against lung
cancer.

University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center researchers
are reporting that a diet emphasizing such foods as soy products,
carrots, spinach, broccoli, beans, grains, oranges and berries appears
to significantly reduce the risk of lung cancer.

"What your mother told you is right," said Dr. Margaret Spitz,
chair of M.D. Anderson’s department of epidemiology and the study’s
principal investigator. "Eat a varied diet complete with fruits and
vegetables. A higher intake of them may lower your lung-cancer risk."

The study, reported in this week’s Journal of the American
Medical Association, found participants who ate the highest amount of
"phytoestrogens" had a 46 percent reduction in the risk of developing
lung cancer, compared with those who ate the lowest quantity.
Phytoestrogens are naturally occurring compounds that act like estrogen in the body.
he apparent benefits of high phytoestrogen intake were seen
in both smokers and people who never smoked but were less pronounced in
people who’d quit smoking.

<p>Spitz cautioned that the
study results shouldn’t be seen as a license to keep smoking while
eating more vegetables. She also said the research needs to be followed
up with a study that continues to track participants.

The M.D. Anderson team asked participants about their diet in
the past year. The study enrolled more than 3,500 people, the largest
study to examine dietary phytoestrogens and lung-cancer risk in a U.S.
population.  Smaller and foreign studies have suggested
phytoestrogens might act as a chemopreventative in lung and other
cancers, but the data have been inconsistent.

The
study was triggered by the research team’s 2004 finding that women who
used hormone-replacement therapy — taken to restore estrogen to
postmenopausal women — had a lower risk of developing lung cancer than
women who didn’t.

The team wondered if foods with low levels of the compound would have the same effect.
—————————————————————————————————-
todd.ackerman@chron.com

HoustonChronicle.com — http://www.HoustonChronicle.com | Section: National
This article is: http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/nation/3372702 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 62 other followers